• Million@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    I may be ignorant, but from my experience Boston Dynamics is cool and if they were able to sell these things to the AI guys good for them!

    I know these robots are used to do maintenance vhecks on big factories, where a dude can tell it to walk to a valve to look at it through a camera, and i think thats fine.

    Instead of having 50 cameras you have one walking one.

    • barnacul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      I work in big factories and this is a stupid fucking idea.

      Scenario 1: you have 6 trained maintenance guys on shift. One of them goes to check out the questionable valve and fixes it because they are trained to do so. The 5 other guys also work on stuff.

      Scenario 2: one of the maintenace guys sits in the office because someone needs to coordinate with the robot dogs. They call the person who controls the dogs to go check out the valve. It is broken. A couple hours later they call a maintenace tech to check it out for real. Unfortunately the company can only afford 3 maintenance techs now because of the dogs, and one of the techs is on tech duty to communicate with the dog team. The other two are busy so the incident is recorded in the logs for an engineer to hire a contractor to fix at a total of three times the price, in six months’ time.

      • Million@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yes it would be stupid to fire staff for a robot dog. Like you said there would be even more staff needed to maintain those dogs.

        But it is case sensitive. Like you said, someone gets a call to go check out a questionable valve. Maybe that call was made by the robot who patrols a long corridor with 70 valves day and night, snapping pictures of the valves and sending them to the control center or something like that. And then again, who goes through those pictures to determine a questionable valve? AI? And if the valve needs constant surveiling, a robot dog and AI is not the tool for the job, its a wrong valve at that point.

        But if a plant has a gabillion dollar and non critical infrastructure, why not let john maintenanceman drive a robot dog?

        But yes they are expensive toys at the end of the day. I would hire a human every time if the labour was suitable for a human.

  • arcine@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    SMASH THE CLANKERS ! Any solid metal rod will do ! Get out there and smash those sorry imitations of “dogs” to pieces !

      • arcine@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Any successful hunting technique is by definition a good technique. All that matters is getting the highest possible kill count !

  • LettyWhiterock@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s kinda funny how these dogs went from cute and interesting robot developments to tools of the military industrial complex. The people who designed these are disgusting and depraved.

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Not really. The people who designed these are nerds like us that want to push the boundaries of science. If they don’t do it someone else will.

      The people that choose what to apply them too are the ones with poor morals. You could build these things and only sell them to places that use them for monitoring things like they do in dangerous factories these days.

      • moustachio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        Nah not buying it. The people who built them are depraved scum. There’s a certain point they definitely knew these were going to be used for shit like this, and they kept doing it anyways.

        • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Think about Oppenheimer and the atomic bomb. Yes, the research created a weapon of massive destruction, but the same underlying science led to nuclear energy, medical isotopes, and countless other peaceful applications.

          Most engineers aren’t working to create harm, they’re pushing the boundaries of what’s possible. The bad uses are real, but they don’t erase all the good that comes from that knowledge. The moral responsibility for how technology is applied sits with those who choose to deploy it, not the nerds building it.

          It would be like calling Tim Berners-Lee depraved because of what the internet has done for surveillance and propaganda.

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    170
    ·
    9 days ago

    These systems are able to navigate complex landscapes on their own, alert authorities about security threats, and can provide around-the-clock video surveillance.

    If only there was a cheaper way to provide around-the-clock video surveillance. Alas, we don’t have the technology.

  • OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Ah, lovely. I see that one Black Mirror episode is taking another step toward being reality.

    • arcine@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Hunting them for sport must be fun, and there is zero guilt unlike regular hunting ! I bet they are extremely vulnerable to pit traps 😁 just hide the hole under a tarp and watch em fall !

    • glibg@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      9 days ago

      Snare one, wrap it in some kind of faraday bag, then disassemble it and resell the parts. Or befriend it and play Frisbee together.

        • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 days ago

          I mean, that won’t really work. It dampens the signal, not eliminates it, and in order to block communications, you need a net width small enough to block 1/4 wavelength which is 5cm/4, so <1 cm holes with a material thick enough for the damping.

          That would be a net that weighs like 20kg lol and it would essentially be a solid cage at that point

          Not to mention that it would have to fully encompass them.

          Better to just use a signal jammer like they do for drones.

      • redsand@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        A half cube metal shipping container could very easily be modified to work as a faraday cage. Or even a Trash cash.

  • Damage@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    So if we raid a data center, besides RAM we get free robot dogs? Sweet.

  • nshibj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    guarding some of the country’s biggest data centers

    The country, ah yes the only place that exists on the internet, the almighty one powerful country to rule them all. THE. COUNTRY.

  • org@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    9 days ago

    Think hiding in a big box and walking slowly would trick it?

    • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      9 days ago

      One or two shots from a silenced 22 rifle would shut these dogs down without all the hassle of feeling bad about shooting an actual dog. It would keep you far enough away to not be filmed.

      This would cost the data center 300k while only costing 15 cents or less for two bullets.

      • arcine@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        That’s the spirit ! But I think there’s more creative fun to be had with these, I’m almost certain they are not trained to recognize and avoid booby traps…

        Hunting without any of the guilt. I can’t think of anything more fun to do !

        • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          9 days ago

          You might be underestimating how much damage a .22 round to can do to something, especially when that something is probably at least like 60% lithium ion battery by volume. Yeah, .22s are small by bullet standards and have low stopping power, but they’re still lethal.

          That said, if you’ve got a 308 handy, that’ll work reliably too. You won’t be silencing it, but feel free to blow a hole clean through one of these machines and enjoy the fireworks when its battery lights off.

          • OwOarchist@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            9 days ago

            especially when that something is probably at least like 60% lithium ion battery by volume.

            One .22 round to the battery pack will fuck this thing up good. Lithium batteries do not like being punctured and shorted out at the same time.

            Worst case scenario, you’ve suddenly decreased the battery’s output enough to force the thing into shutdown. Best case scenario, the punctured battery cells go into thermal runaway and start a fire that consumes the whole thing.

        • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 days ago

          As usual, shot placement is key. I imagine the navigation sensors are fragile enough that a small air rifle could do enough damage to disable them, but a .22 would definitely do it and maybe even be enough to lock up a knee or shoulder joint.