• kieron115@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    lmfao. apparently the way this was originally written would have prevented non-exempt routers from getting security updates. you know, the alleged reason this ruling even exists. somebody at the FCC office of engineering and technology must have noticed because they issued a temporary waiver (PDF file).

    Applying the revised 47 CFR §§ 2.932(b) and 2.1043(b) to the newly added Covered Routers would have the effect of prohibiting permissive changes to Covered Routers even if they were authorized prior to the March 23, 2026, Covered List addition. This prohibition would be in effect even for Class I permissive changes—such as software and firmware security updates that mitigate harm to U.S. consumers—because previously-authorized Routers are now covered equipment. … Therefore, OET concludes that a limited waiver until March 1, 2027, is warranted and in the public interest. March 1, 2027, is convenient because it is the date until which the recent DoW determination excepts certain otherwise Covered Routers. Prior to March 1, 2027, the OET will re-evaluate whether to further extend applicability.

  • garbage_world@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    People here: “Hahha, I’m so smart, I’m going to flash openwrt/opnsense and use whatever PC as a router”

    They want you to do that. This law exists for a reason, to decrease use of foreign proprietary, potentially unsafe software in critical infrastructure.

    By using openwrt you’re doing what lawmakers want you to do.

  • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    155
    ·
    8 days ago

    Just to spell out what many comments already hint at:

    There are no US-made routers. “Made” here refers to companies, not where the stuff is actually made. Even if the plastic housing happened to be made in the US for one or two products, the components are still from far away.

    Those few US companies paid MAGA for this.

    This is corruption pure and simple.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      8 days ago

      And also I’m SURE there will be no backdoors installed in these routers. This was a mutual deal to control information, not just a financial one

      • lorty@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s okay when it’s OUR backdoor, it’s not okay when it’s their speculative backdoor.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      Those few US companies paid MAGA for this.

      Almost certainly not just a money thing. They very likely also made deals for government access to and control of their devices. This isn’t just corruption. It is fascism.

  • Australis13@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Are there actually any US-made consumer network routers on the market? All the brands I can think of are pretty much made in Asia these days.

    • thejml@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      8 days ago

      Ubiquiti is an American company, not sure if the tech is really MADE here though, seems like that’d be weird considering the components are all made outside the US anyway.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        8 days ago

        Ubiquiti may not be considered consumer with regards to this, but it’s pretty unclear so it’s a bit of a gamble.

        • thejml@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yeah, it’s all so ambiguous. I switched to them because they were better made and cheaper than the Netgear I was forced to replace after 1.5yrs. It’ll be interesting to see where this ends up. Probably lawsuits. Glad I’m already set for a while, I guess.

        • kieron115@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 days ago

          It would be funny if, like, the UniFi line got banned but the EdgeOS line didn’t just based on target audience

        • Mirshe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          8 days ago

          Nah, “conditional approval” is written into the regulation. You might know this wording better as “pay us a large sum and we’ll give you approval.”

          • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            Based on the regulation as written, approval is granted only if the company:

            • Fully reveals their entire supply chain
            • All business relationships and contracts
            • Justifies why they aren’t producing in the US
            • And provides a detailed step-by-step plan with a fixed schedule for moving production to the US
            • Which is then monitored by the government
        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          It’s not a ruling, the FCC was ordered decided that they’re not going to certify any new foreign made home routing equipment. No certification means the radios won’t be legal for consumers to operate

          This isn’t a law or judicial ruling, it’s policy

  • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    8 days ago

    It’s incredible how every day in this country continues to be unimaginably dumber than the last.

    • 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s really amazing how this country just ran on word and vibes up to this point. Turns out you could just do whatever and nobody would have the cajones to stop you

  • RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    8 days ago

    The rent for your ISP provided hardware is about to go up by x10. Also you will get a letter saying you don’t have an approved router installed.

  • Phoenix3875@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    8 days ago

    So consumer grade routers are a security risk, but not ISP switches or server routers? That’s the opposite of what a state level actor would look for.

    • ferret@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 days ago

      I mean, it’s kind of old news that these consumer routers make up the majority of bot nets, although I doubt requiring them to be US-made will change much.

      • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        As I read it, they are scared of the Chinese Communist Party having an “official” back door built in. Not run-of-the-mill criminal bot-nets.

  • themurphy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    8 days ago

    Be ready to get shut out of the global internet and only use Trumpernet.

    Seriously though, they’ll block yalls internet access in a few years.

  • Tarambor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    The only slight problem with this is that there are no routers made in the USA.

    • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well, you can run your own router on your own hardware but other than that, agreed.

        • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          My point was mostly that the concept of a router can be executed by any computer with more than one NIC.

          Trump isn’t disallowing computers from outside the US, surely, only stuff that looks like routers. They’ll have a hard time defining what a router is.

          • Reygle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Yeah, I wonder how the dumbasses licking his boots will feel about brands like Qotom/etc making high interface mini pcs- whether they consider them “routers” under this. I hope we don’t have to go back to what I did 10 years ago- cheap intel desktops with 3-4 nics.

    • excral@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      New business venture: sell computers that totally aren’t routers, pinky promise, but just randomly happen to run OpenWrt perfectly and have all the needed hardware.

  • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Great, so zero network products can be sold, and we have to dispose of any existing ones in a couple years.

    I guess the US won’t have any Internet anymore.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      8 days ago

      Perhaps it’s a fallback plan in case the universal Internet ID thing doesn’t work out. Gotta keep the masses stupid and uncoordinated.

    • kieron115@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 days ago

      Based on the language, it would seem to exclude ISP provided routers as those are not “designed to be installed by the consumer”. It also excludes anything not SoHo.

      • darkdemize@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        I haven’t seen an ISP offer tech installation on anything in years unless the home wasn’t pre-wired. Self installation kits are the norm these days.

        • oaklandnative@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Seems like a great opportunity for ISP to start charging whatever they want to install their crap. Don’t want to pay for the installation and use their router? No internet for you!

    • compostgoblin@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      Where did it say we have to dispose of existing ones? It doesn’t say that no products can be sold, and the article specifically says models that have already been approved can continue to be sold. I also think it’s dumb, but it’s important to be accurate.

      • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        In an exception to the usual rule, routers included on the Covered List can continue to receive updates at least through March 1, 2027, although the date could potentially be extended.

        I guess it depends on what this means here. It COULD mean that you won’t get software updates (security updates) next year.

        • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 days ago

          Lol i love how something so massive was just given an arbitrary 1 year date. We all know it’s because nobody dealing with this has any clue what the impact is, and any that do don’t care because it will probably be making them more money… no way this all happens within a year, and if it does it’s gonna be a shit show.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m so glad they’re focusing on this instead of how shitty and expensive our home internet is.

    • Stupidmanager@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      Mandatory Triple play packages by xfinity is coming BACK! Yay… I forgot what it was like to over pay for my internet with 2 additional services I don’t want. Can’t wait.

      /s

  • maplesaga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Something is happening, first the age verification and now this. They’re setting up to verify identities online I presume?

    • Australis13@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’m more wondering that if all consumer network routers have to be made in the US (e.g. forcing people to use the ISP-provided one), it makes it easier for them to utilise the ISP’s backdoors for monitoring of people’s LANs. If that’s actually the goal, then the next logical step would be to deny anyone access using a third-party router or ISP-provided router that didn’t have their firmware.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      They’re setting up to verify identities online I presume?

      To track online activities.

      To ensure nobody is doing anything the government (or its corporate funders) don’t like.

      Look at the Project2025 manifesto and see how much they want people’s activities to be controlled.