Language is always changing. At one point ‘an apron’ was ‘a napron’ while words like ‘literally’ are no longer literally literal. What are some language battles that have been lost in living memory and what are some others you predict will soon occur?

Edit: Non-english examples very welcome!

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    People no longer double-space after sentences.  No one cares that further compares metaphorical distance and farther compares physical distance.  Most people seem to think that joining two independent clauses with a comma (a comma splice) is just fine.  Things are now done on accident instead of by accident.  Compute used to be something you did; now, it’s something you rent.  People seem to have given up on less being used for uncountable things and fewer for countable things.  Now they just use less for everything.  People these days are enamored ‘by’ something instead of with it (or of it, for our British friends).

  • Ydna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ending sentences with propositions, and getting them jumbled around. My work does it in their advertisements and i cry every time.

    “See what classes you can register for.” Or modifying it to be worse; “see what classes you can register for fast”

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I still use them. I find it makes reading and finding sentences easier in a paragraph. There was a study that it had an impact

  • CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    Australian English language is now largely Americanised, a process that started in the post-war era is now mostly complete.

    • Terms such as ‘gaol’ have been widely replaced by ‘jail’.
    • ‘Programme’ is mostly replaced by ‘program’.
    • A ‘car bonnet’ is likely to be called a ‘hood’.
    • ‘Play lunch’ is mostly replaced with ‘recess’.
    • ‘Pusher’ is mostly called a ‘pram’
    • ‘Lacker band’ is now mostly just ‘rubber band’.
    • ‘Boomer’ no longer means kangaroo, but instead ‘Old person.’

    I’m not really bothered by it or anything, but it’s been interesting to see it shift even over my lifetime.

  • likebudda@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Apple put the nail in the coffin for adverbs when “Think different” let illiterates think they were speaking correctly.

  • _deleted_@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Decimating” no longer means killing ten percent as the Romans did; now it is used to mean the killing of a majority, so it’s close to the opposite of its original meaning.

    • Klear@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      The meaning is derived from the brutality of the act, not the proportion of people killed.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        You’re being downvoted, but I suspect you’re actually correct. A note about the act of decimation: it wasn’t just killing every tenth soldier. It was that the other nine soldiers were forced to kill the tenth. It was an absolutely brutal act where soldiers were forced to kill their friends and comrades.

        It makes sense that saying an act is as brutal as decimation would then come to replace the word itself over time. That happens pretty frequently in language evolution.

        • Klear@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          People really love to feel smug about others using words “wrong” for some reason. Let them. I don’t care.

  • MrPnut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    The one that bothers me most (heard a lot in the software dev world) is when people say process-eez instead of processes, even if it is technically a word now, like ain’t

  • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    We were always supposed to put punctuation inside quotation marks; however, now it seems to be the user’s choice of inside or outside. And I have to admit that most of the time when I’m using quotes, it seems more logical to me to place the punctuation outside of them.

    • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      We were always supposed to put punctuation inside quotation marks;

      Isn’t this a US English thing? In India we were taught to close them like brackets - i.e., the one that opened last closes first. So

      ‘Don’t wait. I will come later.’

      But

      He said ‘I will come later’.

    • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      You know, I actually prefer that it be variable, but only when it serves a purpose.

      Like, if Im quoting someone “I might want to indicate that they completed a sentence.”, but also continue beyond it.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, I still feel like I’m supposed to, but frequently I think it makes more sense to pull it outside if it isn’t part of the quote. Putting it in the quotation makes it seem like it’s associated with the quotation, when it may not be.

    • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      For me, i make peace with this by thinking, the rules are one way for writing dialog, and perhaps another way when needing to convey the exactness of a quote.

  • RavuAlHemio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    From my perspective, literally being used for emphasis does not actually change its meaning, it’s simply hyperbole.

    If you complain that you’ve been “waiting for hours”, even though it’s been 45 minutes, that doesn’t change the meaning of “hours”, you’re just exaggerating.

    Hyperbole is a stylistic element; style is a completely different level of language than grammar/spelling/semantics (word meanings). As another example of style, ending a sentence with a preposition is grammatically correct but stylistically not recommended.

    • AnarchistArtificer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      The OED actually includes the definition of literally as being what used to be the opposite of its definition nowadays, so I think that it does count as an auto-antonym (a word that means both itself, and the opposite of itself)

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I agree, but there was a period in the '00s, or maybe early '10s, where the meaning was changing because you only ever saw it mean “figuratively”, to the point where dictionaries included both meanings. I think it’s settled back to its original meaning now though.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    Literally is still understood, it just gets misused.

    Going in a bit of a different direction, emojis and things like /s are well understood now, which is an addition.

    • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s funny, quite a few misguided souls on the threadiverse seem to think that the /s is implied.

      On the internet, it never is. That’s why we invented it.

    • Dagobah@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I wonder if some day in the future emojis will make their way from casual conversation into business? I guess I already use things like 👍 in semi formal work chats - it’s especially useful as a way of ensuring a message isn’t read sarcastically or passive aggressively. LLMs seem more than happy to plop an emoji or two into a document.

      Speaking of AI I’m already noticing that poor spelling, slang and the like are almost signifiers of a human. I wonder if ways of talking that distinguish us from AI will become more common or more valuable?

      • vk8kv@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        In my country, a lot of my peers (me too) use stickers (the cute ones) in in-company-chats usually with people we know like colleagues and managers

        So I assume emojis are also done?

        • Dagobah@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Actually, when I think about it. I rarely see people complaining about emojis at work. Ironically if there’s one place that people hate emojis it’s Reddit or Lemmy 😅.

          Do you speak another language than English? I’d be fascinated to know if similar language battles are happening in other languages.

          • vk8kv@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Yes! Well, I am from India, so… I speak multiple languages with people who are comfortable in their own and yes, there is a lot of language battles in India too, especially Search up Hindi Imposition if you’re interested.

    • FluidBeef@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I still feel like that one is a flavour-of-the-month adjustment - “literally” as an intensifier is already being replaced by “lowkey”, “deadass” etc…

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        If so, that’s great. Literally was taken; sometimes you’re trying to communicate something that sounds figurative, or like hyperbole, but it’s not.

  • LeftReddit2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    Loose and lose might as well be the same word these days. Drives me up a damn wall.

    That and “POV” doesn’t mean what it used to mean anymore. Also drives me up a wall.

  • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Reticent” used to mean ‘reluctance to speak’, or, ‘holding your tongue’, but in the last decade I saw it being used more frequently as a straight up synonym for ‘reluctance’. I wonder if people maybe think it’s a more authoritative sounding word?

    It’s not a change of convenience or cultural drift, just a sign of people reading less and subconsciously trying to hide it, I think.