• 1 Post
  • 132 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 14th, 2025

help-circle

  • I’ve never used portainer sorry.

    If you see the published port for a very short time then something might be crashing when it tries to start.

    docker logs searxng from cli might be revealing

    edit: I do have a searxng container and my compose.yml is very similar to yours. I guess we both copied the example. The only difference I can see is that you still have the env variables for UWSGI_WORKERS and UWSGI_THREADS. I just set both of those to 4 instead of using the SEARXNG_ env vars











  • I don’t have any credible feedback for you.

    I dislike php. That’s my feeling. The vibe.

    When I’m browsing self hostable things I avoid php unless it’s really the only option.

    My completely unsupported “feeling” is that apps written in php are awkward and clunky and just less pleasant to host.

    I’m sorry if that offends you, and I don’t care at all what you think of my opinion.

    I only mentioned “php apps feel old” because I could see you were some kind of php devotee and that it would trigger you. Maybe look into that.


  • Lets back up the truck a little.

    Sounds like a cool idea, why don’t you set it up?

    This sarcastic little witticism required a sarcastic and witty response, which I provided.

    Obviously I’m not going to set it up because, as I said in my earlier comments it’s a dreamy idea. I could go on to say, in the absence of such a technological solution, archive.org should still refrain from copyright infringement because they quite obviously aren’t viable with their current stance.

    you’re licking the boots of record companies

    You’ll have to help me understand how this is so. In my comments I laid out a plan to maintain archive.org’s data for no (or very little) cost or effort, while ensuring that those record company’s receive nothing.

    For users, the value of archive.org is the data. However, that data has no value to litigators nor anyone else. You can literally let the existing organisation collapse, and take the data to form a new organisation.

    If you want to interpret this plan as doing “nothing at all” then you’re free to do so.

    However, and forgive me this final sarcasm, doing nothing at all would be more productive than a change.org petition.




  • There must be a lot of complicated aspects to this that I don’t understand.

    The right course of action seems obvious to me…

    Firstly spin out a separate organisation to manage the wayback machine. It shouldn’t be part of the pot defending against litigation like this.

    Secondly, and I feel silly saying this but… don’t institutionalise the perpetration of rights violations? In the age of distributed databases and the dark web and the block chain and federation surely we can figure out a way to archive media that doesn’t put people or organisations at risk of litigation.

    Finally, if the individuals involved with IA are not liable for the debts of IA then the organisation should fold because that’s practically free compared to defending against these litigious assholes.