• stankmut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re missing their point. The west doesn’t have as large of a black community as the rest of the country because of things like Oregon being founded by white supremacists with a no black people allowed rule. The south might be more racist, but it has a large black community because of slavery.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s different in that black communities are allowed to exist. They have not been in much of the west

        • KnitWit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, in many parts of the west they were not even allowed those marginalized communities. For all intents and purposes, Oregon was a ‘sundown state’ until the civil rights era. I have coworkers whose deed to the house they bought still has (obviously now unenforceable) language in it stating that the house may only be sold to a person of caucasian descent. Oregon was anti-slavery, not because they opposed slavery, but because it would bring people of color into the state. I say all of this as a southerner who was shocked to learn the racial history when I moved here to Oregon.

          Portland may be progressive today, but that is a recent development, and the rural portions of the state still fly a traitorous flag.