• Quazatron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    ·
    1 day ago

    January: We’re going AI native, please use AI as much as possible.

    March: Everyone needs to attend workshops on how to maximize AI productivity.

    July: Some models are only available for special (properly justified) cases. Speak to your manager. Turns out that some people did everything (even commits) with top cost models.

    August: Ok, we’re setting some limits on token usage, due to some people spending 1000% over the average.

    September: we are creating additional frameworks and limits to AI use.

    It took a bit of time for the actual AI cost/benefit to reach the top management and put some hard numbers in contrast with the hype machine, but it’s happening.

    • amgine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      1 day ago

      My company is at the July stage. Who knew giving people unrestricted access to Claude enterpise with no training would blow through budgets in days

      • Supercrunchy@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Our management is so “forward-looking” that we are still in the March stage: they want AI used everywhere, and added everywhere in the product.

        Saying that sometimes you still need to use the brain for big decisions will make some people question your prompting skills publicly.

        Hell, we even rebranded the whole company to be an “”“AI company”“”. I hate it there and I sense layoffs coming soon, but finding a job in this period is hard. Wish me luck.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Still in March over here. My management is pushing hard for us to start doing shit in copilot, and I’m humoring them, but I’m looking at current news with a very Ralph Wiggum “I’m in danger” mindset

    • doctordevice@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Everyone who was paying attention even a little bit has known this would be the trajectory from the beginning. And we haven’t even gotten to the crazy price hikes per token that are coming.

      • Joe@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        1 day ago

        And we haven’t even gotten to the crazy price hikes per token that are coming.

        Why do you think that?

        IMHO, API prices are likely to drop over time as we scale up and efficiencies are found, combined with general pricing pressure from the competition… SOTA models will continue to have SOTA prices, of course, but reasonable priced distilled and open weights models are already common.

        A consequence of API prices dropping is that “heavily discounted” consumer plans will also adjust and won’t be so generous relative to API prices.

        • criss_cross@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Because these companies started selling at a loss from the start to get people hooked. Neither Claude nor OpenAI are turning a profit right now.

          • Natanael@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            16 hours ago

            The biggest problem isn’t cost of running the models right now, the biggest problem is all the debt they built up on training and data center buildouts. That’s what they need to recoup and that’s what’s going to drive prices up. And once it’s recouped they’ll need to make pure profits.

            And I hope that debt kills them because all the big AI companies are terrible in one way or another, and the eventual price disparity will make it uneconomical to use their models. Then we might return right back to development focusing on small models, not large ones.

            • wewbull@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              And I’m sure you’ve noticed how all the revenue and profit numbers that leak out ignore “one off” costs like training and data centre building.

            • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              15 hours ago

              But look how dangerous these models are. They need to be regulated so that only responsible closed model providers can produce them.

              Just ignore that the responsible closed model providers are the ones opening their sandboxes and training their models on blackhat sources.

        • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          1 day ago

          IMHO, API prices are likely to drop over time as we scale up and efficiencies are found, combined with general pricing pressure from the competition… SOTA models will continue to have SOTA prices, of course, but reasonable priced distilled and open weights models are already common.

          Some of this seems like wishful thinking to me.

          “as we scale up” We already have large data centers, and, if anything, “scaling up” is just driving up expenses for debt and hardware. The real problem with AI, relative to the internet boom, is that the more you use it, the more expensive it is. The economies of scale to be taken advantage of are minimal.

          I do think price of compute will come down, but exactly because people will be running their own open source models on their own hardware instead of Sam Altman to stack GPUs in a warehouse, but it will still be too expensive and inaccurate.

          And we’re still headed for a financial cliff in this scenario.

          • Joe@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Of course they want to turn the corner and ideally keep all their infra, but they might need to restructure their debts if/when the creditors come knocking.

            BUT: they have a money printing machine with inference… Enterprise is where most of the money is made, as they pay (closer to) API prices… consumer & small business plans are heavily discounted in comparison, with mostly underutilized use-it-or-lose it plans. They’d be stupid if they were making an opex loss on inference.

            As for why API prices are dropping? Competition is a bitch… but they seem willing and able to play the game for now.

            • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 hours ago

              If we’re talking about the survivability of AI as a technology, I agree.

              If you’re talking about the viability of the hyperscaling business model, I think we are looking at wildly different sets of information.

          • naught101@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Like a fraction of a percent of people will run their own models. It won’t influence price. Remember that coders/tech people are only a minority of users.

            • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Oh, I see. I was mistaken. I thought tech companies were OpenAI’s major customers, and they certainly could make their own data centers for internal work, and that coders–that minority of users–were the only ones likely to pay full price for tokens, the rest of us wouldn´t be willing to pay full fare for a machine that is right most of the time sort of. Thanks for setting me straight on that.

              • Joe@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Some large companies do it … but I think you greatly overestimate the willingness of large enterprises to build and maintain their own infra. Once a company has lost the competency (and many have), it’s hard to get it back. There are always pockets of people with the right skillset in a large org, but they mostly don’t want to do DC work anymore. Team/personal servers and beefy laptops, otoh…

          • Joe@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            They gobbled up the easy money… now they have to work harder for more, and yeah, they may have to slow down a bit and embrace fiscal responsibility… I expect to see restructuring of debts along the way, but I’d be very surprised to see any of the major US based players implode.

            • Jaysyn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Both Anthropic & OpenAI have debt repayments coming up in 2027 that:

              • cannot be restructured
              • cannot be postponed
              • they absolutely cannot pay back without even more VC money, and that faucet is being cut off right now.
    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I feel like we’re co-workers, with how perfectly that timeline matched the day-job’s progression.

      We’re at “did you take the seminar on looping that uses tokens like a firehouse so you can use less tokens? Why are you using too little (/not enough) tokens, and why is it not magically 10x-ing all of your (fucking ansible) config?” Or some shit.

      • Quazatron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think this was the standard management reaction across all the companies that embraced AI as if it was the second coming of Jesus Christ.

        • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          They thought it was their ticket to fire everybody, and the more they made you use it the sooner they could fire you.

          • Quazatron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            Soon, the guys upstairs will realise that the real savings are in replacing the middle management with agents, not replacing the workers. Fingers crossed.

                • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  24 hours ago

                  I was a PM at a major now-hyperscaler and one of the engineers on my team was pretty vocal about PM not contributing.

                  He ended up leaving for a team that didn’t have one. A few years later I happened to be in his new building, he saw me, and came up with this huge grin on his face, “oh wow are you joining our team?”

                  You always hate the chick writing the specs until you don’t have one any more. 😂