Can they grow them with funky colours?

Having switched to linux, np++ is one of the programs I miss the most.
Inb4 ‘just use [insert software here] instead’; yes I know alternatives to np++ exist. And I know wine exists. I don’t miss np++ enough to go that route

And what happens to be the story behind your mother’s maiden name?

WHAT’S YOUR FAVOURITE LINUX DISTRO

Lol. They accidentally switched on their new feature and called it a bug.
So the question is, why did they make the feature?
My guess is that they built it to convince investors that they could jettison entire userbases at the push of a button. In particular, investors of the silicon valley bigotry kind

Well deserved. F-droid is a cornerstone of (mobile) FOSS

I wish I knew then that debbie does the trick for me

First thing that comes to mind is RISCV. Although it’s not new, it is gaining traction in consumer computing

deleted by creator

Great idea and a great person to take it up

A rambling piece that boils down to a poorly substantiated opinion.
Namely, the author is under the impression that the wikimedia foundation spends unnecessarily and that, because they raised more than they spend, they should reword their requests for donations.
I half agree with the last point although the author doesn’t seem to understand that a couple of tens of millions is not a lot of money for a foundation of wikimedia’s calibre.
As for the first point: the author simply assumes that the spending is unnecessary. This is at best substantiated with other people’s opinions. If the author had presented actual detail on the expenditures, they could’ve made an actual case. However, the absence of such detail gives off the impression that there is no real substance to this criticism

deleted by creator

What sets opensuse apart from distros like debbie?

I’m not sure why I would get this openwrt one i stead of one from Turris

Pressure cooker

deleted by creator

“When we step back and look at it, we see that it is a de facto open ecosystem. Open ecosystems benefit from having consortiums with stakeholders, all with a voice in driving the ecosystem forward”

Lol if the x86 ISA is an open ecosystem, CocaCola is an open source beverage.
Trying to read between the lines though, is Norrod implying that they are considering moving toward a more open x86?
The impression I’m getting is that they’re thinking about sacrificing various legacy features (32bit being the most obvs one) to bring performance per Watt closer to the competition. And then put in its place a more standardized successor? RIS86? They will likely aim to steer clear of formal (published) standards because they want their trade secrets. However, they will need to simultaneously ensure not to violate antitrust rules.
Might be easier for them to just forfeit trade secrets and embrace a different model altogether.

🎶 They look like robots but are actually just guys 🎶

deleted by creator

deleted by creator