• 8 Posts
  • 483 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: April 10th, 2025

help-circle

  • You can’t make a reasonable microwave receiver lighter than solar film and efficiency peaks around 50% in FIXED installations

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/microwave-power-transmission

    In JPL 30 kW power was transmitted for 1.54 km with reception conversion array having an efficiency of 80%

    That was 8 years ago.

    What I’m describing are… currently extremely active areas of research.

    Microwave power transfer has been used for many applications since its inception by Maxwell. Wireless charging of EVs and UAV using microwave power are some of the widely researched examples.


    you can easily assume less than a quarter (under 10%) when the target isn’t just moving, but is also changing angles and distance (you’d have to put the receiver on a gimbal like for cameras)

    You should maybe look into the level of precision that things like Phalanx CIWS systems have at tracking a moving target, with the ability to throw bullets at it, and hit it.

    Or basically any SPAAG type platform that throws rounds down range.

    Or I dunno, MASERs used in deep space transmission.

    Or all the research that has gone into developing tracking gimbal systems that do intentionally use lasers or some kind of DEW to shoot down small drones, or damage aircraft in flight, or burn out incoming missiles.

    Hell of a lot easier to track a friendly aircraft.


    and now it’s also interfering with flight (propeller airflow, unless you do weird propeller geometries or tilted body flight

    Genuinely no clue what you are talking about.

    Are you assuming only like, quadcopters here?

    We’ve had RQ 4 drone aircraft the size of WW2 medium bomber planes, with jet engines, for 20 years now.

    I’m fairly sure that a jet engine produces a considerable amount of consistent heat.

    Do… you think aircraft engineers… do not know… how to handle… heat?

    Shall I describe a ramjet to you?

    Or maybe we could go with something like the Space Shuttle’s reentry tiles?


    In conclusion, you are vastly uniformed as to the state of… not even state of the art technology, that would be incredibly relevant to this discussion.


  • We don’t even have automated battery replacement working on the ground, while stationary.

    Building aircraft with a whole bunch of their body and mass that significantly changes, in flight, is extremely expensive and difficult.

    Its why the V22 Osprey is widely regarded as a death trap, why we stopped building swing wing F-14s.

    … Have you ever tried to uh, remove your car’s rear seats, while on the highway, at 60 mph, and then also installed new seats, from a neaby car travelling alongside you?

    Ok now do that with aircraft, at 15k feet, going 600 mph.

    Yeah I’m sure that’ll be about as efficient as Elon Musk’s approach to designing the Starship+HeavyBooster.


  • Oh, ok.

    Even though this entire post is… about how it is small enough to fit on a drone, and efficient enough to power it for 3 hours.

    Ok.

    Gotcha.

    I’m not sure if you’re aware of this, but densely packed explosive bombs and missiles and warheads tend to be pretty heavy.

    … the entire problem with purely onboard solar powered vehicles of any kind is that they have to be absurdly lightweight, flimsy.

    That isn’t practical.

    It might be purely efficient, in a sense, but it isn’t very useful.

    Being able to actually move stuff, that is practical.

    Most transportation modes involve the ability to haul stuff.

    You know, do work, aka the capacity to make stuff move.

    You picking a fight that makes no sense to pick.

    You can have solar and batteries be more stationary, and use microwaves to power things that are more mobile, this post is literally the proof of that concept… you can charge a battery with a any kind of power source.

    Look heres another massive potential application of this, if you science fiction extend the accuracy/capability of this:

    Plop a bunch of solar panels/batteries in the L1 point between the Earth and the sun.

    Now, via a set of satellites in something like concentric orbits, you can get absurd amounts of power, beam it back along chains of satellites, snd then beam it to recieving stations on Earth. Or the Moon. Or orbital infrastructure.

    Microwave transmission power loss will be waaaay less in space, because there’s no atmosphere.

    Same with solar panel efficiency!

    Solar Power + Microwave Transmission = Very Good, Actually.