Sure, but you seem to be under the impression the only bots are the people that disagree with you.

There’s nothing stopping bots from grooming you by agreeing with everything you say.

Everyone who disagrees with you is a bot, probably from Russia. You are very smart.

Do you still think you’re going to be allowed to vote for the next president?

Like why would you think it to be not possible, I wonder?

It’s technically possible, but it’s also possible that the jet was hit and they’re covering it up.

At a certain point under this new administration you’re going to have to realize that waiting for solid facts will mean waiting fifty years for documents to get declassified (assuming the US lasts that long). This only serves the interests of the regime, it can just lie and you’re forced to accept it because you don’t have enough evidence to disprove its lies.

When the truth is unknowable we are reduced to speculation. If the administration is hiding casualties, it certainly would also hide something like this. Why shouldn’t I just go with my gut on this one?

If you trust the word of the US military you’re just going with your gut too.

Y’all don’t really think that fighter jet just fell off the aircraft carrier, do you? Am I supposed to believe the jet fell off the side of a ship that big because it was turning too fast because it was dodging missiles?

“I just found that very unprofessional, very rude, especially when I was just a journalist who’s trying to do his job,” he said of Omar’s response.

Aww. Gonna cry? Gonna shit your pants?

Fuck off.

He’s not spineless! He stands up to his constituents for his donors every day. 😉

You could dab it with a little paint or glue or something.

It helps when you reframe math as a puzzle, because then it becomes a game. It’s not interesting unless you make it interesting.

“New Math” kind of tries to do this, although then you run into the problem of parents being unable to help their kids with homework.

If lab grown teeth give me better reception then I’m all for it!

That makes sense, but it’s still strange because it means in the case of a fire the entire building has to be treated the same anyway because there is something in the building that reacts with water even if its separate.

I guess it is helpful to indicate that there are multiple substances that have different reaction profiles, but it still seems strange to me.

The reason for listing them separately is because each individual chemical has its own ratings. You can’t simply take the highest of each and combine them into a single sign. For instance, in this case one chemical isn’t flammable but is explosive when heated. The other chemical is flammable but not explosive. So if you see a chemical on fire, you know it’s the second chemical and isn’t explosive. But if you see something that isn’t burning in a room full of fire, you know it’s a potential powder keg waiting to explode.

Okay, so the two signs on the building have a weird combination.

The sign on the left indicates something that isn’t flammable, but reacts with water. The sign on the right indicates something that is flammable, but there’s no risk of reacting to water. If the building caught fire then a first responder on the scene has to read both signs at the same time. They can’t spray the building with water because the non-flammable substance would react with the water.

So why aren’t the signs combined? They have to be treated the same anyway.

Sure, but I don’t think the building should have two labels. I think it should have one label that reflects a warning for everything in the building.

Imagine you have a crate with two different chemicals. The chemicals are in different bottles so they aren’t mixed, and each bottle has its own label.

Should the crate have two unidentified labels like this, or one? There’s no indication what those labels refer to on the building.

But the building, as a whole, pesents the combined risk of both chemicals.

But it’s just slapped on the side of the building with no indication of which chemicals the labels are for, I don’t think that’s how it’s supposed to be done. It’d be like mixing two chemicals into a bottle and then putting two labels on it.

I think there should just be one label that combines the warning levels of both i.e. 3-2-2-W

As others have said, these are NFPA signs.

What I want to know is why there are two different ones. What the hell does that mean?

People are being sent to concentration camps.

Without revolution, things stay the same. Risk death on your feet or live on your knees.

Sometimes you can get lucky and avoid revolution, and we should always strive for those peaceful alternatives, but sometimes there’s no other choice.

Okay, so my theory is that it’s all market manipulation and insider trading. If we assume Trump isn’t just fucking stupid, he’s telling his inner circle “sell when I blow the market up” and “buy when I backtrack” to massively enrich them by gaming the stocks.

There’s no way this will keep working, eventually the market will actually crash, but until then they stand to make a lot of money.

Remember: the rich get richer when the market rises and when it falls.

It’s called revolutionary optimism.

I’m right where I need to be.