It’s crazy that one manufacturer being below 50% market share is news.

Not necessarily malware, but clicking on any link in the email, including the unsubscribe button, will let them know there is someone reading, and even clicking on links in the mail that goes to this address.

What happens when you click learn more?

This is why “privacy” doesn’t work on a closed system controlled by a third party.

Should have phrased it differently: Banning a post on a specific linux distribution is not a “ban on discussing linux” in general.

The linked article has a screenshot with a link to a post about openKylin getting removed. OP title is “Facebook ban on discussing Linux?” including the question mark. I don’t think it is accurate. At the same time I’m not defending Facebook in any way.

Discussing a specific linux distribution is not “discussing linux”.

Linking to a post on another website about a linux distribution isn’t either.

Make it

Contains a way to earn some kind of currency

So the browser itself is like an ad

Contains Ads

I don’t know why anyone ever installed Brave

Could mean anything, or nothing at all

Ok did any twitter user believe they owned their account?

agree, but for some reason many people don’t seem to think that way

Mastodon or Lemmy, because you would have to choose an instance and a client. Threads, because why would you?

This could be a nice little computer if it had good linux support

It was referring to this part:

some people will want to stay on Chrome. So for them, this IS a problem.

They want to keep using a product even though they don’t like it. A product that is free to use just like most of its alternatives.

They made a choice, they live with the consequences.

Maybe limiting internet usage is enough, spending extra time on a linux pc with no internet might just be an opportunity to learn something.

Wasn’t it unblocked again soon after?

It knows the distance from Earth, but that’s not what the question was. It’s 13.6 km from somewhere.

hä wieso