The way you word it suggests that donations to Mozilla are expressly forbidden from being spent on Firefox. Which I doubt is true.

But yes, many would prefer to donate specifically for Firefox development than into a general pool for Mozilla to allocate as they choose.

Marginal at best when everything is made elsewhere and requires fossil fuels for transport.

I think the alternative: copyright should be looser. It usually only benefits corporations and lawyers.

Though it would be naive to consider AI companies and ally in a goal to reduce copyright terms.

If it wasn’t for StarOffice/OpenOffice/LibreOffice Impress, is have thought a rename to Impress would be a good name.

I read this a few weeks ago about it.

https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-men-who-killed-google/

Always been a fan of it being Hal Finney, regardless of any evidence. It’s poetic symmetry with losing both around the same time.

How does the use of ccTLDs furthers harms against the countries?

Ten years ago sure, the days I’d suggest matrix instead.

It’s an abundant resource curse; land is the resource that is wasted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_curse

Were they real or just shit novelty, scams, or rebadges and sister brands of those multi brand companies like BBK?

Is that a picture of a straw man?

Not to mention that material science has improved a hell of a lot since Hindenburg.

Why?

Calling it verified is the only problem for a paid service. Name it Premium, +, anything else that implies a value added experience. But pay for verification is stupid.

The ~ has an error of +/- 50 percentage points.

What new personal information did meta get from Instagram users enabling threads?