TiddlyWiki was infact an inspiration for Obsidian when it just started

contraception

I’ll just leave here the response from obsidian. If you can extract truthful reason from this corp double speak, please share

https://tenebrousdragon.com/Essays/FOSS+and+Obsidian

deleted by creator

Would be interested in more detailed followup about the search. Anything in particular stands out?

Fyi There are automated instances mirroring Twitter accounts that for some reason refuse to register on mastodon

Project: Joplin joplinapp.org !joplinapp@sopuli.xyz

What it does right: Focus on user experience by aligning aims of product with aim of users.

Everything it does is foss, however its main revenue achieving product (cloud sync target) is focused on convenience rather than vendor lock-in. So it incentivizes the project to cater to its users.

What’s so unique about it: due to lack of monetary incentive a lot of oss projects simply forget about the user and serve mostly to themselves. They fail to listen to feedback because listening to feedback means loss of resources rather than gaining them. As a result many critical bugs are unfixed for decades and UI is so dated no new users want to use the product.

TLDR: don’t forget to create revenue generating module along with the main foss product

Bloody banking apps. I’m sick of them not exposing any API to make third party apps.

Linking my own issue in the hopes that it’s somehow connected
Federation issue: posts and comments from beehaw accounts don’t show up on other instances - Beehaw

Newsblur is foss app with sustainable business model. Has Android on fdroid; but desktop is web version only

deleted by creator

To quote Linus Torvalds “**** ***, Nvidia”