Just funny that you are saying that you can’t relate to someone because they can’t relate to someone. Empathy isn’t just about feeling other people’s pain, it’s about being able to understand things from another perspective.
Not being able to relate to them is literally relating to them.
The question wasn’t wether there are inheritable health issues, diabetes, some cancer, etc are demonstrated to have a heredity component. I’m not even arguing that heart disease ‘isn’t’ hereditary, I’m just saying that in the context the argument, you saying that several of your family members had it doesn’t prove that specific thing is inherited. Everyone does of something and the fact that you can find 3 to 5 people in your lineage that died of that does point to it being inherited.
Shouldn’t exist. That’s different.
Their belief system is based on an a being that can’t be sense that banished people to infinite torment for following instincts that he designed them with, then sent part of himself to be tortured and killed as a sacrifice to make up for a curse he put on them, but only if you it was necessary. A ridiculous age of the earth is hardly the craziest thing schools like this teach.
That’s like saying black lung runs in families because your family all worked in the mines.
Funny? Do you think religious schools don’t exist?
Wonder how many new ones it’s creating.
Scientist: ‘Look at this science thing that is definitely true because DNA!’ Narrator: ‘It wasn’t true’
Was this description meant to be ironic, or was that accidental?
Did you typo or did he? .03 is significantly bigger than .004
Makes sense, but it still seems like all the recognizable ‘quotes’ mentioned are quotes the movie used, and not ones that are came from the movie itself, to the point where it would only be in very specific context where anyone saying them would be quoting Aliens.
The top two are obviously familiar, but certainly wouldn’t attribute the first one to that movie. I don’t think I’ve ever heard the next two phrases used or remember them from the movie, and never heard anyone use ‘mostly’ as a reference from that movie.
Maybe it’s an insider thing
Or people who get really used to using it, use it
That is true but pretty irrelevant. Is a law enforced is a completely different question from is it a law, and it’s not an insignificant degree of difference.
That’s like someone asking if chocolate ice cream exists and you saying it’s possible no one likes it. Technically true but irrelevant to the question.
Technically yes, especially since this was a technical question, he wasnt asking if he would get pulled over, he was asking if there was a law being broken. You probably wouldn’t get arrested for hooking your donkey to a post on main Street on a Sunday in Colorado springs, but if you asked if there was a law against it, the answer would be in the codified law, not in is likelihood of a cop knowing it.
That just calculates into whether you get pulled over or get a ticket. He specifically asked if it was breaking a law which has little to do with where the cop is a dick or not. Doesn’t technically even depend on the judge.
Kind of, though with rules. I think I’m describing something closer to structured, encrypted torrents.
Why not? One good ability I’ve heard is why watch a movie or listen to music or play a game if you know it’s going to end? No one and nothing is it’s best all the time, just understanding that there are some things that can be worth experiencing is the best life has to offer, really.
On a related note, it would be nice if there was a shared storage option for self hosting. It wouldn’t be the same as self hosting, but more like distributed hosting where everyone pools storage they have available and we could have an encrypted sharing option.
I did actually read that, and the donation was a good direction, but still equated to selling the car on the regular market which puts her in the regular sales cycle and doesn’t have much impact in that way. A donation and auction could have been more impactful.
Not sure how you came to that conclusion… If she donated the car and it was then sold, it’s the same but distancing herself from the sale while also potentially raising even more awareness at the charity and advertising a ‘discarded’ car vs a sale and donation of funds.
I would say the bigger takeaway is that reducing supply by one car can be more than made up for by raising awareness and this potentially reducing demand. At least she accomplished part of this by the announcement, even if it could technical raise demand by those that would react out of spite.
It only ‘matters’ to the extent that OP claimed it doesn’t run in families, and you seemed to be claiming it does ‘because’ you had 3 -5 relatives that died from it. All I’m saying it’s that anecdotal evidence doesn’t refute an assertion like that.
If you’d said ‘it does run in families and here is a statistically significant sampling across variable x, y and z’ i wouldn’t be arguing, I’d likely be reading an article about it. But it’s worth pointing out when people use unscientific reasoning in a forum where other people might be influenced by an argument if no one calls out the fault in logic.