Welp, I totally misunderstood the question then. Sorry.

Have you tried emailing the authors? It’s well known that some folks will gladly respond with a copy of the paper at no charge.

Removed by mod

I always thought the cyberpunk genre was a warning, not a blueprint.

He was a guest on her podcast when he said this, so no, it’s not stupid news.

If only there was an article to read.

I totally misunderstood what you meant. My bad.

Turning into? Sure, if you asked this back in the 80s.

Even further, ChatGPT isn’t an AI, and AI doesn’t exist.

That’s basically the premise of the movie.

From the article that was posted:

The main new feature is support for I2P, the Invisble Internet Project. It uses a fully encrypted privacy network layer to hide user activity and locations. The network does not use servers. Peers contributed “a portion of their resources” to other network particpants.

The maintainers promise that “non one can see where traffic is coming from, where it is going, or what the contents are” when the Invisible Internet Project is active.

Collective punishment is a war crime.

Amnesty International says Israel is committing collective punishment in Gaza.

Israel is committing collective punishment in West Bank, too.

universal healthcare won’t solve the issue, unless we can get costs under control.

But universal healthcare would get prices under control. You’re thinking completely backwards.

universal healthcare won’t solve the issue, unless we can get costs under control.

But universal healthcare would get prices under control. You’re thinking completely backwards.

It’s not a beer she has in her hands.

And to think, I just got downvoted to fuck the other day because someone claimed wasn’t available in the UK. lol

Thank you for clearing that up.

If you’re in the States, maybe take a peek at Firefox Relay.

Oooooooo, is this the start of a RATM parody?

Please feel free to protest, but only in the way I want you to.

That sums up what you’re saying, right?

it should be about the game, not whatever social, political, or economic issue the player is interested in.

How naive to think that there has never been any social or political commentary in sports. No Jackie Robinson, no Muhammad Ali, nothing. Right?

“I wear pride stuff during pride month” is the new “I have a black friend”.

People wanting to be treated equally shouldn’t be seen as political speech. Increasing visibility for a group of people who have historically been largely made to hide shouldn’t be seen as radical.

Based on your logic, we should also no longer allow anything that shows support for the cishet community. No more mention of the player’s wives and children. I think that sounds fair, right?