more non falsifiable vaguery

the entire problem with your comment is that you are using vague language and not defining your terms. as a result, you have presented unfalsifiable theory.

no one should believe anything you’ve written here.

animal liberation front did some good work. earth liberation front, just stop oil… you get the idea I hope

they can organize among themselves. affinity groups that practice direct action are like my favorite political orgs.

I just want to say I love militant vegans, so long as militant means they are organized and actively creating the world they want to live in. if they are just preaching, I would not say they are militant, just evangelical.

and, to be clear, I’m neither. I just find militancy admirable.

Would fewer non human animals be exploited in a meatless Monday world? Yes.

I wouldn’t count on it

honestly too light

I thought you said it was common knowledge. is it groundbreaking research?

I’m right, so I have no reason to change course.

getting snowed isn’t something to brag about

having seen them repeatedly target other users, spin up new instances, and keep on doing it, I have no compunction about calling this shit out

I don’t have any strong opinions on the matter, but I do have strong opinions about Phil’s conduct.

this is nonsense.

I think their goal at this point is to try to push a narrative that I am “toxic as fuck” and did some various outlandish things and need to be banned or defederated

do you think that because it’s explicitly what I’ve been saying?

whether they are all the same person or are all saying the same bizarre things all at the same time for some other coordinated reason.

false dichotomy.

ah. it’s 5oclock somewhere

because I’m not interested in arguing. I’m only interested in pushing out someone who routinely badjackets other users.

Okay, sounds good.

your sarcasm doesn’t make you seem any less toxic

I don’t have a counterargument at all. I’m calling out your toxic behavior.

what does this mean