No. You can have an opinion, but that doesn’t prove it isn’t settled in facts.

If they could read they would be upset by that.

"there is plenty more but you have seen all the important stuff - go outside and do something "

That is lemmy for me. I have removed communities I don’t want to see, and subscribed to a lot of them and sort by hot.

Once the posts start losing quality (up votes) I move on.

Shoot an insurance ceo and your votes will go up.

It’s not impossible to counter this while still having text be correct if you use a dialogue model that takes parameters to ue in calculation of the output dialogue.

“Dialogue here should lead you to the {direction}.”

NPC cords, quest objective cords = calculate relative position, insert in dialogue.

The game knows after you take the quest. So it can also know at the moment.

You need to vote for people that will PUT guillotines on the ballot! If there are none, find someone who will, or be the change you want to see.

You can’t do that with personal information like the ones doctors needs transcribed. It has to be local.

I instinctively closed your comment after reading “short attention span” because I knew what you were going to say. Had to go back to comment because I realise the irony.

Damn autocorrect striking again.

Blåhaj here I come!

While I don’t want to support weapons, blaming people that bought the vr headset in the past for what he would do with the money after the sale is a very bad take. You can’t blame them for not knowing the future.

Also the argument itself doesn’t make much sense and can be strawmaned to “you pay taxes, therefore you are a complicit in the murders of your military, therefore you are a bad person”.

Haha, nice. I had to go back to read his post twice to see what you were talking about.

Scanned orange juice bottle “wrong item weight. Please wait for assistance.” Yes I have actually encountered this. :(