

Careful. I suggested kagi in another thread and was accused of being a shill.
Don’t understand how people can pay $7 for a coffee but won’t consider paying $5 or $10 a month for clean search results.
Careful. I suggested kagi in another thread and was accused of being a shill.
Don’t understand how people can pay $7 for a coffee but won’t consider paying $5 or $10 a month for clean search results.
I did enjoy the parts about the Cultural Revolution and some of the dialog from Da Shi. That’s about it.
I’m stuck on Bobiverse too. This whole section on the Archimedes alien did me in.
The Three Body Problem is bad. The hype for the book is a good example of “The Emporer’s New Clothes”.
Honestly, no. You don’t need any sort of Facebook replacement.
That’s where I’m stuck in the audio books. The Archimedes story is fine but drags on too damn long.
My wife and I had ceramic tile installed in our kitchen when we remodeled our house. Didn’t like it so four years later we had it torn out and had oak flooring installed. Couldn’t be happier. High quality hardwood floors are really durable.
My 60th birthday.
If Zombieland taught us anything, it’s the double-tap.
I’ve almost forgotten how shitty Google has become. Been using kagi search for a year now.
It’s so nice to get clean unbiased search results.
I’ll pour one out for the Yaris.
It’s useful for my firmware development, but it’s a tool like any other. Pros and cons.
Five years ago the audience would have fawned all over this kind of crap.
It’s good to see people are wise to his stock pumping strategy now.
It’s intentional.
Obviously, Google makes money showing ads during search. But they have finally bit the bullet and starting tarpitting users in search in order to show more ads.
A quick, useful, and accurate search means that you’re on their site for the least amount of time, perhaps mere seconds. That’s not what’s best for revenue growth.
PS: Go try Kagi and be reminded what good clean search results look like. I use it because my time has value. It’s very good.
Guess I’m out of the loop. Who’s Elmo?
My wife is there.
She’s gotten two knee replacements this year and is scheduled for a hip replacement before the end of the year. And last night I reminded her she’s been meaning to go to a dermatologist.
I honestly thought you were going to tell me that was an Idiocracy quote.
Mencken makes sense too…
When I was younger and drank more I did this, and it sure helps with hard liquor.
When you’re drunk that big glass of water can be hard to get down, but do it anyway.
The point of the test is to demonstrate that vision-only, which Tesla has adopted is inadequate. A car with lidar or radar would have been able to “see” that the car was approaching an obstacle without being fooled by the imagary.
So yes, it seems a bit silly, but the underlying point is legitimate. If the software is fooled by this, then can you ever fully trust it? Especially when sensor systems exist that don’t have this problem at all. Would you want to be a pedestrian in a crosswalk with this car bearing down on you in FSD?