ShellMonkey

Exactly, but rather than asking to talk about it OP wants to play a troll game. I’ve had someone in my house try and OD as well, it’s not something you forget.

Put a pill in a glass of warm water and check on it in a few hours. If you mom was sick and had a bunch of pills in there it wasn’t because they just stocked up over the years.

This is a company that’s been reported to use the dwell time of you mouse over a product as a potential indicator of interest. Something like a Citrix remote desktop is extremely chatty trying to keep the origin and server in sync with every move of a mouse or keystroke. If the ACKs from the origin confirming the receipt of screen change data took an abnormally long time it could show in system performance metrics pretty easily.

HSTS says it must be encrypted but a proxy will create two connections and look at it clear in the middle. On the other hand cert pinning says it must be a specific cert that breaks the site if decryption is used. Apple is big on doing that for a lot of their site and apps.

Works fine in they Voyager app

Right, and if both sides have their public ally routable IPs on their respective firewalls it’ll work. If on gets put behind a NAT of some sort then it would be able to speak outward, but would require specific packet routing inward (port forwarding) to have someone connect in. Stateful sessions will be fine so long as the one inside a NAT is the initiator.

If only one side is behind a NAT then so long as that one initiates the tunnel it should work fine. NAT only really is a problem on the inbound side.

Snapshots largely, most everything is VMs and docker containers. I have one VM set aside for dev work to test configs before updating the prod boxes as well.

Looks like it’d still a thing

https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2025/09/google-antitrust-ruling-firefox-search-deal

Google puts up a major chunk of the funding Mozzia gets in a year. If you don’t want them being the default choice in search or having your queries fed to their bots then start putting up the money to make their support no longer required.

Sooo, they act as an admin and can assign mods instead of using someone else’s node and being a mod?

Aside from what I understand as an inability to actually remove bad content that gets in, how does that differ from something like hosting a fedi site?

Then you get things like the platform you’re on where in my case it resides in my house and lets me be that big scary admin/mod. Having the ability to purge bad content and actors from a central space is needed for anyone but the most thick skinned masochists to use a platform.

Plenty of people just want to go talk/post without wading through a swamp of the crap that one uncle brings up at Thanksgiving on a regular basis.

The system formerly known as Freenet has a module known as the web of trust that uses a similar model. It’s interesting but runs into a problem of forcing users/hosts to propagate content and messaging they don’t wish to be associated with.

There’s a reason places like gab or hexbear end up isolated islands, the general population has no desire to be preached to be the lunatic fringes.

Last I ever was hearing this pushed around the fedi the big ‘sell’ was that mods/admins can’t delete posts making it a ‘freeze peach’ platform.

The only people typically drawn to those are the people who tend to get banned for being intolerable on civilized platforms.

https://docs.mailcow.email/

Has worked well for me, but keeping in mind that email is probably about the hardest thing to properly self host.

DMARC/DKIM/SPF/MX records have to be set up properly, DNS for auto config and such preferable, and dealing with a myriad of mail IP blacklists (good monitoring service for free: https://mxtoolbox.com/) all come into play.

Depends on a few things. If you actually put the site ‘through’ cloudflare then they act as a SSL offloading proxy and could read the content.

If they’re just providing a DNS record than no, that just points people in your direction.

It can make a big difference just in the processing power needed if there’s anything more intense than a straight firewall. IPS tend to be a resource pig. What are the load numbers saying vs the number of CPU cores available?

I ran into similar (or even worse) choking trying to get it virtualized even with a proper passthrough that I eventually shelved but might take another run at someday. Knocking a couple hundred watts off the stack is always welcome.

In itself true, but if you have several competing distros then you run into the problem of attracting developers to the platform if none have a solid market share. It’s a bit of a chicken and egg thing, if a platform doesn’t have a sizable user base it’s hard to attract developers and it’s hard to get a user base without readily available apps.

Linux on phones or desktops suffer from one major problem as I see it, too much choice.

You make a Windows app it has to work with the latest couple versions, same with Mac.

Make one for Linux and you have to test it against dozens of popular distros, package it in multiple ways, and hope the dependencies are gonna match.

It’s an awesome system for IT people and server admins, but for the end user, ehhh… That seems to be the problem things like snap and flat packs are aimed at fixing, which could transition to phones but first you gotta herd the cats into an agreed state.

I have one around that same class that is running Security Onion, because why not record and analyze all the things.