There’s a butterfly meme to make here, not sure if it should be aimed at the scammer or the reposts
There’s a butterfly meme to make here, not sure if it should be aimed at the scammer or the reposts
The c/reddit community is not for people who love reddit. Having reddit in your name doesn’t mean you like or support reddit. There’s no irony, youre just misunderstanding my username, the sub and just about everything else. Stop trying to make fun of people’s usernames.
What I should have said was “reminder: nobody give a shit about going back to reddit” for the slow one’s in the back looking to take things personally.
Talk about the post instead of attacking people directly. I can have whatever in my name and say “nobody cares you can still access reddit”, it doesn’t matter how you interpret my username. Reddit was once something else.
It’s okay you’ll never get it. Go back to feeding money to spez now
This is a community about reddit discussion/news. Most posts are about how they censor, monetize and essentially wage war with their communities #luigi. I don’t need “reminders” to go back.
They circumvent reddit ads by paying reddit directly for the API (using their own ads). It still funds reddit.
Reminder: nobody gives a shit about reddit
How do you figure that?
They run ads and subscriptions to afford the API, which is paid to spez.
Apple stopped providing encrypted storage, but they didnt unencrypt the existing storage for governments to see.
My comment does not say jury nullification shouldn’t exist/be allowed. It says the opposite.
Unpopular take but despite it being a popular thing, we want jury nullification to come from individual conclusions that this law does not apply despite the circumstances, and not because they know they can. Every study ever has shown that people who know about jury nullification tend to dismiss evidence more often, and are more easily deceived by a sympathetic/ non-sympathetic looking defendant. It’s not even a law, it’s the result of the fact juries can’t be prosecuted for their decisions so really they can do whatever they want. This is enough to know that technically you can “nullify the law”. That goes both ways, people can convict without evidence
Saying the law doesn’t actually apply despite the person having done the thing the law says not to do is very different from saying the punishment should be nil. This could also keep you from ever serving on a jury and telling others about this in certain circumstances could be a crime. All the legal minds who looked into this agree it should still remain a thing, but it shouldn’t be told to jurors explicitly. When you serve you swear to uphold the law, so it’s tricky to nullify without purgery perjury except for very very special cases.
This is not a good YSK, you should understand what the law is as a juror. You could in theory reword this entire post without actually using the term and that would probably be helpful, but super complicated to write.
Esit: I’m team Luigi (in mario kart of course)
I think leaving gulf of mexico is ok
Try to find some that are made properly.
Insecurity. “Males” is a pretty wide brush in this case
Why am i not surprised to immediately find garbage like “genocide Joe” in your post history.
You couldn’t even formulate an argument. Thanks for making it obvious why to block
He wasn’t just a joke, musk was legally forced to make his deal real to avoid having manipulated the market and potentially go to prison. This was before he became POTUS . If it happened today he would just tell the courts to fuck off and replace those who aren’t loyal without ever actually buying twitter
Twitter was never profitable until data was worth enough and even then…
Musk tried to pump and dump the stock by saying it was worth much more than it was. Then he immediately got sued because if you manipulate the market like that and have the cash to pay, you have to or it’s considered a crime. Musk then tried to back out, shareholders threaten to sue, and he pretended he actually didnt wanna back out and bought it.
He purchased it at twice its market value and has since not only cut 80% of staff, but also lost 80% of its original value (not the double musk paid)…
Twitter only had value to musk because he wanted to use it as a disinformation tool to help SA/Russia/China. He immediately made it a right wing platform where this content is more valuable. It was a dumb decision, still has a dumb business plan and a fuckton of debts. The only reason it didn’t disappear completely is Musk is too rich, but it’s trending down. It’s projected to grow as the US becomes an oligarchy but not because it has real value. Musk wants to turn it into Facebook+ Cash app
Buying twitter was all in all a terrible business move and mostly to stroke elons ego. Sadly this is “too big to fail” territory
Someone was literally arguing that they removed "tesla* from the papers but that it was always going to order electric vehicles, and theyre just removing it for the woke idiots who see collusion everywhere.
I don’t think theyll ever understand oligarchy, to them it’s completely normal to take advantage of your power, Trump convinced them it means youre smarter.
Gonna be a long 4 years, that’s if they ever allow democratic elections ever again. Luckily cheeto will croak soon, so he won’t be able to perpetuate his reign like Putin does but someone else might pick up for him.
A bad person can create a good product sure, doesn’t mean we need to support it.
Same reason suckerberg went full elon. It’s the gold rush of corporate greed with a conman at the helm
It breaks old-timey encryption.