
Because it’s an anti-privacy law wearing a costume, genius.
Because it’s an anti-privacy law wearing a costume, genius.
Orwell was literally a socialist who armed himself and went to kill fascists. You’d think that bit of common knowledge would answer this stupid question.
Removed by mod
Well that’s egg on my face. You are right. I thought that when I played breath of the wild in a Wii u emulator that it was just matching up to the Wii u. Apparently it was much better, so when I saw my nephew playing it on switch I thought it was performing worse than the Wii u. Now that I went to run it again, I see that it is running at twice the frame rate of the switch or the Wii u and four times the resolution.
I do have to say WTF? They released a mobile game that can’t run at full 30 FPS consistently on multiple platforms?
Did you play breath of the wild? It ran like trash on the switch compared to the Wii u.
And I’m not a console guy, but I’m pretty sure a docked Vita was more powerful than a switch too.
The game runs fine on PC. Your problem is that you crowdfunded a PC game and expected to play it on a 10-year-old Android tablet. They never said they were developing it for switch. The switch was weaker than cell phones that existed when it was released and it’s a joke to expect it to run anything now beyond undemanding mobile games.
Not only is it still Android but the thing that the article says is special about it, blocking trackers and stuff, is trivial to do without installing a custom OS image. Change your DNS, trackers/ads gone.
DRM manages rights for products you own. Twitter does not own your posts. Simple.
Oh no, I’ll just wait 6 months and play the games for free. Like I’ve done since N64.