I think the person you were responding to meant that the execs were not useful (see the parent comment), or at least not as useful to the overall enterprise as their salaries would have lead you to believe, in comparison to a standard developer.

Yes workflow systems are useful. Jira is a bad implementation to a good idea. It might help if they listened to feedback from people who actually used their software to improve it. Tbf they do make some good changes occasionally, like adding dark mode (which isn’t perfect but also it isn’t nothing).

Prior Sprints do not Exist.

There is your active Sprint, there is a huge pile of all tickets that ever were, unable to be sorted by any reasonable metric, and there are the interlinks between tickets. Nothing else exists.

When your Sprint ends, say goodbye for you shall literally never see your helpful comment that you put all those details into again.

Not me.

(I’ve known that all along, since I first laid eyes upon it and it refused to sort by “date”.)

Uh… lower profit margins for the CEOs?

As other comments are noting, they did not need AI for this. On the other hand, they now have it!!!

Using words like “deanonymized” and “pseudonymity” probably doesn’t help, either (well, it helps them).

Anyway, bold of us to presume that they will even care about accuracy prior to deployment.

We have so chosen to not be ready for what is to come.

PieFed, at the discretion of community mods, offers restriction of voting to only subscribed community members. This limits drive-by downvoting from All, where people would not have read the community rules (which in PieFed are repeated in their entirety at the bottom of every post from that community).

It also offers restriction of voting to only “trusted” instances, thereby introducing a third category between the binary federation vs. defederation.

I have also seen communities on PieFed that disable downvoting entirely, even to subscribed members, even on the same instance.

Community mods can enable or disable these settings at will iirc.

“B-b-but my side virtuous (in all ways, and can do no wrong), while their side ignoramus (everything they do is because they are poopy-heads)!”

I wish I could add /s here but a good half the population on earth seems to hold to this as an invariant position, solidarity in the face of all obstacles, i.e. the Nazi bar effect.

Case in point: who doesn’t love it when a religious institution offers food and shelter and medical care to the needy, or counsels people to forgive, laying down their burdens and seek therapy to thereby travel lighter through the world? It is the diddling kids part that for some strange reason (/s on this one) people tend to get upset?

Since we were talking about Zionism here, I will mention that Deuteronomy 13:5 (in the Torah, part of the Old Testament for Christian and Muslim and offshoot religious branches such as Mormonism) provides an EXTREMELY stern warning about those who would misuse their authority to lead people astray.

TLDR: intolerance paradox - if you tolerate the intolerant, it corrupts the entire system, giving it a bad reputation when people see the worst excesses and extrapolate that to infer the properties of the whole. e.g. Reddit is fascist, hence we did not stay and put up with it but rather moved here.

(Alt-)“Left” != Left, and in fact shares far more in common with Right (aka: fascism).

I wondered if what I said would come across as criticism - even though I took care to avoid alluding to your comment NOT being statistically bland (which ironically, due to your third point, would have begun to imply that it WAS, despite my saying explicitly the opposite).

So we are proving real-time why LLMs go to such lengths to be bland - their goal of not offending anyone making their shareholders more money does not allow them to take those kinds of risks, as I just did above.

All the more so with their child-like yet incurious audience noping out at the first hint of difficulty understanding producing dopamine upon reading anything at all - not attempting clarification or expounding additional details as just you did.

So kudos I suppose we just proved our humanity? Now to do that 10k times a day for the rest of our natural lives…

A stack of single-sentence paragraphs, you say?

With a perfect conclusion written at the end you say?

Methinks I’ve seen this before somewhere, I say.

Dare to be different, I say.

One of PieFed’s earliest features was the separate distinction between NSFW and NSFL / gore. Although with Lemmy lacking that, I would guess that any poster would be afraid to rely on it without also toggling the NSFW label as well.

Most Lemmy issues lay in wait for literally many years before being worked on at all. At best, the devs struggle to work with their command of the difficult Rust language, while at worst they pick and choose primarily issues that they want to see implemented on their home instances lemmy.ml and Lemmygrad.ml, while the needs of the wider Threadiverse are less important to them. (Or both?:-P)

Which btw is somewhat fine - this is FOSS we are talking about here - except that many people would like to donate to them in hopes that an increased level of code development would occur, only to be extremely disappointed to find out just how much of those funds goes instead to maintain lemmy.ml (seemingly including time spent moderating extremely controversial topics such as criticisms of Russia, China, or North Korea).

Also, there are very long-standing bugs that have been well-known for many years that go unresolved. This is why I say that it is likely unintentional. Authoritarians tend to not have much sympathy for people who want to individually curate their experiences on the platform, vs. simply taking what is given and STFU about it, at least as far as admins are concerned - i.e. curation for them is done at the instance or community moderator level, rather than the individual human. So not much time is expended upon those features - see e.g. the horribly named (so much so as to almost be disinformation) “instance block” that still allows “blocked” users to read, vote on, and reply to your content, plus send you DMs, and then a later code change further added the ability for those DMs to trigger notification pings - again, this is what rights the “BLOCKED” users have, to someone wanting to block them, whereas conversely the rights of people wanting to institute such a block include: shutting the fuck up, and move to a non-Lemmy platform (including the OP’s dubvee.org since he personally instituted real blocking capabilities there, at least specifically for Lemmy.ml, whereas PieFed allows a user to custom block any instance they choose, independently of instance admin approval).

See also https://jeena.net/lemmy-switch-to-piefed and https://slrpnk.net/post/29381524 for some discussions about those long-standing bugs that remain unfixed for years and years and years. i.e. I have no problem believing that the devs gave so little attention to this particular issue as for it to have caused unintentional side-effects - at this point it would be more shocking to me to have read that it had been implemented correctly. 🤷‍♀️

It would have been helpful yeah.

Tbf, this behavior is very much unintentional, as OP explicitly lays out, and would like to make others aware and stop it from happening.

Also, an individual user can “speak about” an instance just fine without getting thus censured - it’s only community sidebar descriptions being caught up in this sweep unintentionally.

So yeah, OP himself shares your distaste that this is a bad thing? But it is not a thousandth as bad as you are making it out to be - which given recent flamewars about Tankies vs. PieFed I wanted to make things crystal clear even if you meant every word there in jest, so that others do not get mislead.

Maybe this can be your first code change PR? 😉

Whoopsie!

Like all of it?! At once!?

I doubt you have what it would take to satisfy.