

Depends on if we consider Zuccer a person.
Depends on if we consider Zuccer a person.
These “ai says” articles are all fluff. You can get an LLM to say just about anything you want. This is akin to “my child says we should eat the neighbor.”
Seed boxes are inherently handling replaceable data, bar unpopular torrents. This is such a silly comparison.
We’ll still be hulks, it just won’t be that incredible.
Oddly I can see neither this reply, nor my original comment, but can reply from my inbox within Voyager.
You can have the most secure and secret OS in existence, and you’re failing miserably the moment it has unfettered access to the internet.
On the flip side, literally any OS can be secure if it’s airgapped in a sealed room.
There’s a happy medium in there, and that’s where most governments want to be.
Somewhat niche a use case, but *extremely interesting. Hopefully it can be adapted for other conditions!
Then the social left started pushing things that it wanted purely because of morals
Example?
Do you mean Calibre?
Bots are indeed a problem, but at the same time so are the huge swaths of users dedicated to a single users whim. When one person with enough pulls says “I want to take over this entire area of the canvas” and it happens in minutes?… it ruins the experience. Bots are just a way for this to happen without the following.
Finishing off Abbadons Gate. Managed to get back into it after many months long break.
The only issue this would truly cause in the long run is a bit of admin work. There are and were plenty of scabs willing to take over unmoderated subs. Sure, the quality of those subs would have suffered, but Reddit never cared about that beyond what essentially boiled down to “don’t let “bad” content stay up.” Beyond that, mods could do whatever they wanted for the most part.
Very odd. I’d have thought they were gonna go for one take as much as possible, but I guess not.
Did we see anything? They are offline whenever I check but it seems they were live about 20m ago?
Not in the slightest.
Might want to edit your title to specify “room temperature superconducting.”
I highly doubt that. Regular people have no real ability to effect the outcome, and the majority of people are saying “there’s no way this absolutely bullshit situation gets fixed” not “what is there to fix? Nothing is wrong!”
No company is paying their PR to say “Yeah [we] are real pieces of shit that need to be hacked up and thrown to the wind but [we] are gonna come out of this just fine so suck our cocks.”
That isn’t how PR works. At least not till they hit dictator levels of power.
I’m willing to bet they’ll care. When your community is vocal enough about such an issue to crowd out others? Yeah, that’s not a good sign for their investment. And it’s all directed at a single person.
Not failing, but actively ignoring Metas own research that shows Facebook is directly harmful to children and teens.
I’d say actively continuing to harm children should outrank being a jackass and/or incompetence.