People.

This would be a great fit for a r/NotTheOnion type of sub.

I don’t need to read an article to know that “no” is the correct answer the question in the title.

I totally get all the concerns related to AI. However, the bandwagon of: “look it made a mistake, it’s useless!” is a bit silly.

First of all, AI is constantly improving. Remember everyone laughing at AI’s mangled fingers? Well, that has been fixed some time ago. Now pictures of people are pretty much indistinguishable from real ones.

Second, people also make critical mistakes, plenty at that. The question is not whether AI can be absolutely accurate. The question is whether AI can make on average fewer mistakes than human.

I hate the idea of AI replacing everything and everyone. However, pretending that AI will not be eventually faster, better, cheeper and more accurate that most humans is wishful thinking. I honestly think that our only hope is legislation, not the desperate wish that AI will always need human supervision and input to be correct.

Is it me or are there guts in this picture?

Laughs in Nestle.

That’s just beautiful

Problem: …

Response: Obliterate one of the most established logos and a verb “to tweet”

Is tha Vim logo at the bottom?

Precisely, karma whoring was already rampant and detestable.

I know there has been a lot of doommongering recently about the innevitable demise of Reddit. However, I feel like this change will be the worst thing the will have ever done if it comes to fruition.

Exactly, even if people wanted to not everyone can afford to arrive all sweaty or wet carrying a giant backpack.

Yes, it’s so cringe. Honestly, he is like a child. Especially that this is all done publicly.

I think commenting or even voting counts as participating. In my view, lurking means 0% participation.

For me, it makes so much sense. Likes and dislikes, besides serving as a means of sorting posts and comments, also serve as a shortcut for leaving a comment saying, “This^” or “I disagree.”