

We have been trying to reach you about your law’s extended warranty
We have been trying to reach you about your law’s extended warranty
The other people interviewed answer those questions if you keep reading
“It really weighed on the creativity of my role, and again, spat in the face of my expertise”, [Ricky says]. “It wasn’t just this though; the tool itself lacks the intent, context, and limitations of what we’re doing. It doesn’t have other aspects of the project, influences, references, or personal experiences in the back of its mind, because it doesn’t have a mind. Whenever we design something for a game, it’s drawn from somewhere, influenced by other things, and filtered through our own experiences as a human. These AI ideas lose ALL of that…"
“What follows from these discussions is me explaining why, usually over hours rather than minutes, that these tools have no place in a professional game development pipeline or production and actually hinder the development of visuals”, Francis says. “I also find myself explaining to them how the iteration and ‘idea’ phase of a project is where the best stuff happens, how exploring things through artistic labor is where your best ideas come to fruition, and why would we want an AI (that we don’t even own) to do that for us with art that isn’t ours to use?”
(Edited for formatting)
If he’s not arguing to improve it, he’s arguing that it shouldn’t exist at all, which is worse.
We must move away from binary tales of catastrophe, not towards naive utopianism that ignores problems and risks that comes with change, but hopeful solutionism that reminds us we can solve and mitigate them…
I don’t like Black Mirror, but I would never say that there’s no place for it. It obviously resonated with a lot of people, and it was probably an entry into the genre for a lot of new sci-fi fans. Very ‘Old Man Yells At Cloud’
It definitely reads like a criticism of Black Mirror to me
Black Mirror fails to consistently explore the duality of technology and our reactions to it.
Absent is the plot twist of Pandora’s box that made it philosophically useful: the box also contained hope and opportunity that new knowledge brings.
Black Mirror didn’t fail to do those things, it wasn’t interested in them
I don’t like Black Mirror. I think it’s generally lazy and sensational. But what this person is saying is not a valid criticism, it’s like saying the Bee Movie would have been better if there had been an extended car chase. Louis doesn’t want to improve the show, they want something else entirely.
If you want a contemporary forward-thinking scifi, check out author Becky Chambers!
I work for an ISP, and this is a common practice among my peers
Top - Past 6 Hours is what I prefer. Keeps it fresh, but filters out a little of the spam
… Meta’s security systems were unable to identify…
I think you mean incentivized to ignore
Now we’re going to have to go north for medicine and graphics cards
Yeah, this is the way. It’s better to let the other person do the translating, rather than presenting maybe your ideas by using a translator. It would be like running everything you post through an AI first. Best to give as much intent as possible
Fuck, I don’t want to be a keyboard pervert, but these are some good points
The title makes it sound like the judge put Data and the AI on the same side of the comparison. The judge was specifically saying that, unlike in the fictional Federation setting, where Data was proven to be alive, this AI is much more like the metaphorical toaster that characters like Data and Robert Picardo’s Doctor on Voyager get compared to. It is not alive, it does not create, it is just a tool that follows instructions.
The existence of intelligence, not the quality
I’d settle for reasonable ports
Welcome! I think you’ll find the community is a lot more pleasant when there isn’t a capitalist algorithm shoveling all the controversial idiots onto your feed!
Data preservationists are beating back the coming dark age. They’re heroes.
It looks just like the Tik Tok ban to me. Racist/Nationalist nonsense that doesn’t solve the actual underlying problem, which is lack of regulation in the US
“the single greatest insider threat risk the Bureau of the Fiscal Service has ever faced.”
https://www.wired.com/story/treasury-bfs-doge-insider-threat/
YouTube continuing to advertise to children while claiming otherwise