• 24 Posts
  • 283 Comments
Joined 4 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年3月2日

help-circle

  • Any insight into the most severe ones, eg is remote exploitation possible and likely?

    The Linux project request CVEs for any memory safety bug just in case some turn out to be vulnerabilities, in which case they may be exploited given enough effort. Many are likely not exploitable or unlikely to be, and/or low severity.

    There are some higher severity ones given the following message. But this doesn’t mean all CVEs listed are severe issues.

    Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in the Linux kernel that may lead to a privilege escalation, denial of service or information leaks.


















  • Well said.

    The one exception where producing images with generative AIs could be acceptable is to study their impact on society and the environment.

    Even in such case, care should be taken to minimize the amount of images generated to the strict minimum, to give as little money as possible to toxic corporations and to minimise pollution. Favor studying images previously generated and already available online if that’s sufficient for the study’s purpose.


  • They’re requesting mostly wrong solutions for real problems.

    Age verification doesn’t address social media’s problems, but does increase data collection and decrease privacy. Same for decrypting private messages.

    A guardian account does seem reasonable.

    They could also completely turn off user seach for minors, so they would have to add contacts by username or email, and couldn’t reach or be reached easily by online strangers.

    Minors could circumvent this if there’s no age verification. But today’s age verification methods are neither privacy-friendly nor hard to circumvent. Until they are, it’s not worth requiring age verification.