• 0 Posts
  • 356 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: February 15th, 2025

help-circle



  • Any linux distro is significantly more lightweight than windows. But I’d say that there is not much difference between arch and for example the most bloated distro: ubuntu.

    If you are a coder, the CLI will be easy. Most of the time the use of CLI is comparable to a single line in your code where you call a function with some parameters.

    But arch is difficult for a beginner. (I wrote some more about my experience with it here: https://lemy.lol/post/61578059/24360161 )

    If you have time, interest and discipline to read the documentation and learn a lot, then arch is great.

    If you just want to use a Linux OS, install Mint and just use it. It’s no big deal, just a normal OS. It’s very intuitive, low friction and no microslop bloat.











  • Arch was definitely tricky to get right for me at yhe beginning.

    You often have a choise between multiple similar tools for each job and you only know the pros and cons or what works and what doesn’t after trying.

    I did 3-4 fresh installs before getting it right for my needs and hardware. (for example, btrfs with buttermanager requires a completely different fs layout than btrfs with snapper, I picked buttermanager first, didn’t like it after 2 weeks and had to do a fresh install)

    For that it’s handy to have a good backup of your important data, ideally outside of your pc, just so there is no risk of fucking it up somehow.

    I definitely recommend using btrfs and using it’s snapsotting feature through snapper or timeshift or something else, again, multiple tools for the same job, different pros and cons.

    That way you can roll back after fucking something up. But make sure to try it out a couple of times before the case comes where you have to rely on it, so you’re sure that it does work and you know how to properly do it.

    I prefer arch cause I was able to customize it more and I love the up to date packages and the AUR. But there is some additional maintenance you have to do like once or twice a year and you have to pay attention to news for manual interventions when there is a breaking update. So it is way more involved than other distros. Yet it has been rock solid for me and should be very reliable once you know your way around.

    But tbh. as long as you are completely happy with mint, there is no reason to change anything.






  • to me that smells like what I said in the other comment:

    Wayland might be a bit stricter when it comes to following specs and not implementing hacky workarounds. (or it could always be a bug)

    I feel like, if a cable is high quality and up to spec, it will work with wayland. But if the signal integrity is below spec, wayland might fall back to slower signaling while x11 is more lax and ignores the issue and so a worse cable still works even if unnoticably below spec quality. Or the 4k over hdmi 1.3 is some hack that x11 supports and wayland doesn’t because it’s out of spec.

    But thats just a feeling. May be wrong.

    Thanks for reporting back with your findings!