Thank you, thank you, thank you. I hate Musk more than anyone but holy shit this is embarrassing.
“BREAKING: I asked my magic 8 ball if trump wants to blow up the moon and it said Outlook Good!!! I have a degree in political science.”
Holy based
Consume the accumulated wealth, power, and privilege of the affluent elite in an act of radical socioeconomic retribution driven by the pursuit of equity and justice for the disenfranchised masses
No. You can raise concerns about a potential vulnerability without having identified a specific real-world method of exploitation.
A privacy-focused search should not potentially reveal to others that you searched something. My examples prove the possibility that it can do that. I’m sure there’s other examples that are less “weird”.
It was just an example but ok, let’s fix it.
You want to see if someone is nosy so you lie and tell them you were arrested in 2006. You check and see “John Doe arrest 2006” or “John Doe 2006 arrest” is cached.
You get the idea.
Unless the terms include a name or location. Plus Leta is not widely used.
Suppose you tell someone in secret that you were arrested. You know they use Leta, so you look up “John Doe arrest” later and see that it was just recently cached. You only told one person so it must have been them. You now know what someone searched because they used Leta.
I don’t like how it tells you when the results were cached. You can tell if and when a query was searched for by someone else.
https://www.malibal.com/legal/terms/
This is so hilariously unhinged. Fun starts at “Geographical Restrictions”
Balaji’s parents claim to have evidence from their independent investigation, such as ballistic evidence from the private autopsy, which they claim shows a downwards bullet travel path that would be impossible by a self-administered gunshot. Balaji’s parents also claim that a tuft of wig hair found at the scene that did not belong to Suchir represents unexplained evidence.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suchir_Balaji#Skepticism_and_calls_for_further_investigation
You did it, you saved Lemmy
SpeakIt. It’s like SheepIt but for powering language models.
Source: i made it up
I saw a post on here the other day where someone was complaining that their coworkers “don’t care” about the current political climate and after they elaborated, they were describing people who do care but weren’t actively spearheading a demonstration. I don’t know if they expect them to go stand in traffic or what.
I give monthly donations to nonprofits that I like and email my state representatives when EFF or Fight for the Future tells me to but I’ve also got a life to live. Just stay informed, vote/petition, donate if you can, but live your life. You can only do so much.
I skimmed it the first time and didn’t notice how bad it was. I don’t like using the word cringe but this is quite the composition, lmao
What a hero
Yeah this thing is worded so strong for what it is
By “business risk”, they just mean bad for the business, ethics aside
So they do care, just not enough? What should they be doing about it?
The only thing really offensive about it, judging from the post, is that they’re positioned before the user’s pins, not after.
They did surgery on a tardigrade