The murder rate is much lower in the rest of the western world, so good chance this will save some lives

UK government who was perfectly okay destroying trans rights now perfectly okay giving the corrupt influences be Trump, 330 million pounds.

It’s denying courts the right to enforce rulings. So when Trump passes a law, order or a way to fund them, the Supreme Court can say the new law is unconstitutional or illegitimate, but can’t do anything about it.

They can’t indite Trump, or do anything that requires public funds.

House Republicans passed this, so I assume it’s what’s the US system… It’s gotta go through the Republican majority in the Senate now right?

Then Trump can make his own laws.

This is why I never feel safe downloading a program from Github. I need a recognisable domain name website that google or duckduckgo has picked as the product.

No it’s not perfect, but it feels safer than a random github.

Finally, human meat available in US restaurants.

They probably saw the Russian culture war brain rot play out with American youth and decided to have a circuit breaker.

Behind the Bastards has an episode about how YouTube went right wing to create site engagement and an anger economy, and an episode about Facebook doing thr same for boomers.

Some governments are looking into limiting those influences.

EDIT: oh yeah, China might also be protecting children from hearing about the periodic stabbing attacks that happen at schools over there. Forgot about those.

Might have to also let people know the Fediverse exists?

If it’s true, China has energy security for the foreseeable future - as Thorium is usually found along side rare earths, and China has the largest deposits of those. More than anywhere else in the world.

Set policies to maximum distraction and appeasement of the base!

Might relate to this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0NBsyhApvU

Yeah, and then they convert that to weighted probabilities or a “data space” which they then search during content generation.

Don’t forget all that Uranium they stole from the US under operation Apollo, or their plan to bomb overseas US/UK venues, I think it was the Lavon Affair…

…or the US citizens killed during the attack on the USS Liberty… Or the fact that Ghislaine Maxwell’s father Robert is a Mossad agent!

All that harm done to the US and Presidents are still friendly with them. What a mental illness.

Our discussion was never about the term factuality. You’ve just now raised that term for the first time in this discussion. You said search engine. They are in fact searching and reconstructing data based on a probabilistic data space.

…and there are plenty of examples of search engines being sued for the types of data they’ve explored or digitized.

…also the inference that search engines are “accurate” or don’t serve up misinformation, and manipulated data is foolish.

No, they’re helping their team mate. The one who gives them tax breaks and deregulates the restrictions on what they can do, with data.

They’re on the same side. Ideology is the lie. Class warfare is the truth.

It’s searched in training, tagged for use/topic then that info is processed and filtered through layers. So it’s pre-searched if you will. Like meta tags in the early internet.

Then the data is processed into cells which queries flow through during generation.

99% of what it generates doesn’t come from anywhere in particular, and you wouldn’t find it in any of the sources which were fed to the model in training.

Yes it does - the fact that you in particular can’t recognize from where it comes: doesn’t matter. It’s still using copywrited works.

Anyways you’re an AI stan, and defending theft. You can deny it all day, but it’s what you’re doing. “It’s okay, I’m a software engineer I’m allowed to defend it”

…as if being a software engineer doesn’t stop you from also being a dumbass. Of course it doesn’t.

“data gathering” and “training data” is just what they’ve tricked you into calling it (just like they tried to trick people into calling it an “intelligence”).

It’s not data gathering, it’s stealing. It’s not training data, it’s our original work.

It’s not creating anything, it’s searching and selectively remixing the human creative work of the internet.

They are. They record the data, stealing it. They search it (or characteristics of it), and reprint it (in whole or in part) upon request.

Viewing it as something creative, or other than a glorified remixing machine is the problem. It’s a search engine for creative works they’ve stolen, and reproduce parts of.

They search the data-space of what they’re “trained” on (our content, the content of human beings), and reproduce statistically defined elements of it.

They’re search engines that have stolen what they’re “trained on”, and reproduce it as “results” (be that images or written text, it has to come from our collective data. Data we created). It’s theft. It’s copywrite fraud. Same as google stealing books (which they had to he sued over the digitizing of, and enter into rights agreements over).

Searching and reproducing content they’ve already recorded (aka stolen without permission), is absolutely part of what they are. Part of what they do.

Don’t stan for them or pretend they’re creative, intelligent, or doing anything original.

The real lie is that it’s “training data”. It’s not. It’s the internet, and it’s not training - it’s theft, it’s stealing and copying (violating copyright). Digital stealing, and processing into a “data set”, a representation or repackaging of our original works.

All the search engines search the same internet, find similar text, output it using similar formulas.

No, and in fact the industry is going to see a reduction as people and companies are realising it’s not a silver bullet solution or even that great at what it does.

The next branch of LLM modeling (now AGI is failing), is likely towards specialisation. Specialised AI problem solving has far more potential than chasing an ill defined and half formed concept of “intelligence”.

No term can exist on its own like that. Everything is relative.