They never implied you were white, they implied you were racist.

Can you point out the part of the geneva conventions that make using incendiary weapons against military targets in non civilian areas a war crime?

Use of incendiary weapons against military targets is not a war crime unless in an area where civilians are present.

Of course they do, it’s main use is smoke generation.

Fair enough, I can see how that might be beneficial.

Ok fair enough, I see how that would be a win.

Is it really a win for LLMs if the study found no significant difference between those using it as a tutor and those not?

Audio description.

I’m sorry, but unless you exposed any US war crimes I’m not sure I can take you seriously.

What US war crimes have you exposed?

Think about it for a second, no, half a second and see if anything occurs to you.

and the fact it invented buddhism.

Siddhartha was born in what is now Nepal.

Why waste time replying just to behave like a child?

Did you even read the links you posted?

What do you mean by respected?

It depends on what your opinion is and what you mean by respect.

If your opinion is not well explained or backed up by evidence/logic and isn’t something completely subjective, what is there to respect?

If your opinion is reprehensible, downright stupid, or ignorant? You have access to the entire base of human knowledge and are still ignorant, so what is there to respect?

Your opinion is completely logical/uncontroversial or is well backed by evidence? Where does respect come into it?

What if instead of boiling steam we utilise the combustion of some sort of liquid coal to move the pistons?