• LWD@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    I see no reason to engage with, or trust anything created by, a bullshit generator. If Digg claims to “care” about the humans, then making the top comment into a brick wall (which has zero accountability) is a funny way of showing it.

    But then again, I’m sure their privacy policy also says they care about your privacy.

    • dil@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      its not a comment its in the post and its alpha, they’ll prob add an option for it to be closed by default.

      • LWD@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        You’re right, it’s not a comment. It supersedes comments. Digg is literally showing you an AI-first ecosystem.

        This isn’t some UI glitch. It’s a feature they stuck front and center. Digg is trying to start a second honeymoon period with users. Why do you think things would get better after that?

        • dil@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Becuase the app is in alpha lol, its janky everywhere, has no settings or customizability uet, cant even make communities yet, ill give them the benefit of the doubt that you can turn them off or auto hide them

          • LWD@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            So not only was the AI put front and center, it was also put in first?!

            I’ve looked at plenty of alpha software before, and I’ve seen plenty of incomplete features. I understand that one has to give an unfinished product leeway. But devs do not simply accidentally add a whole feature into an app. Or if this was somehow all a huge coincidental mistake, they made a massive PR blunder.

            • dil@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 hours ago

              summaries are a non issue, stealing other ppls work to pass of on your own is

              • LWD@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                If you examine why the latter is an issue, maybe you’ll understand why the former also is…

                I already alluded to it elsewhere, but I’d recommend reading up on the harm the zero-click internet causes

            • dil@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 hours ago

              Guess this particilar use of ai just isnt an issue for me, I personally have more problems with lemmys use of generative ai and hyping it up