As we roll out more generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done

we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce

Are we done for?

  • Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    But why? Why make them scared they’ll lose their jobs at any moment Vs feeling secure?

    If they’re scared, they’ll be seeking better employment, applying for other jobs whilst working this highly unstable one. Probably reduced productivity too, I wouldn’t be as productive under that sort of negative environment.

    Make them feel valued and secure though and they won’t leave, there’ll be less workplace issues for you to have to deal with, and they’ll work harder.

    Unless you see them as completely disposable because the law won’t touch you and there will always be desperate people to fill those positions at any given time, fear is a ridiculous thing to want to instill in your workforce.

    • oh_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      That’s Amazon and many other big tech company cultures. Hostile hustle culture. You could always lose your job as you need to be a “top performer” to stay. They purposely let the “lowest performers” go on a regular basis.

    • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      But why? Why make them scared they’ll lose their jobs

      Overly bossy bosses often believe that people work more, or perform better this way.

    • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s abuser tactics - “You’re lucky you’ve got me, no-one else would have you, now take more shit.” It’s cheaper than making employees feel happy and valued. And yeah, some very successful companies absolutely see their employees as disposable. I’m hoping this’ll become a problem for them when they’ve burned through the available pool of vulnerable staff, but we don’t seem to be there yet.