I think 3D geometry has a lot of quirks and has so many results that un_intuitively don’t hold up. In the link I share a discussion with ChatGPT where I asked the following:
assume a plane defined by a point A=(x_0,y_0,z_0), and normal vector n=(a,b,c) which doesn’t matter here, suppose a point P=(x,y,z) also sitting on the space R^3. Question is:
If H is a point on the plane such that (AH) is perpendicular to (PH), does it follow immediately that H is the projection of P on the plane ?
I suspected the answer is no before asking, but GPT gives the wrong answer “yes”, then corrects it afterwards.
So Don’t we need more education about the 3D space in highschools really? It shouldn’t be that hard to recall such simple properties on the fly, even for the best knowledge retrieving tool at the moment.
so you asked an LLM a question and then asked if we should adjust our schooling based on that?
you’re the one who might need schooling again, bruh
yeah, I’m starting all over again with university, so hopefully this will be eventually fixed. About the rest of the population though …
Good luck.
Keep in mind there’s no way to rush hours. Whenever you’re learning something, you can ask yourself roughly how many hours you’ve spent on it. That should reflect your skill and there’s no way around it.