TL;DR

  • Google has made it harder to build custom Android ROMs for Pixel phones by omitting their device trees and driver binaries from the latest AOSP release.

  • The company says this is because it’s shifting its AOSP reference target from Pixel hardware to a virtual device called “Cuttlefish” to be more neutral.

  • While Google insists AOSP isn’t going away, developers must now reverse-engineer changes, making the process for supporting Pixel devices more difficult.

  • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    44
    ·
    6 days ago

    This would be sad if Pixel phones were worth buying, instead of being far inferior to midrange Motorola devices in battery life and performance while costing well over twice as much.

    • Feyd@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Anything being less open is sad regardless of your opinion of the hardware.

    • tisktisk@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      You must be ignoring the Motorola bloat that makes it’s performance beyond subpar somehow

      • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        People who use stock ROMs choose to suffer, just like people who choose to buy a Pixel that will either come unglued, push components through the display, or just constantly overheat.

    • shaggyb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I mean, you’re getting a lot of downvotes, but I’ve gone Motorola -> Motorola -> Motorola -> Pixel -> Pixel -> Motorola.

      Both my Pixels died in less than a year. Each had battery life which, while it did improve over a few weeks as Pixel’s optimization stuff took hold, never reached an entire day. Both were unacceptably fragile. Both failed randomly, just out of warranty.

      And the Motorola I’m using now has none of those problems, was cheaper, is faster, has a better battery, has a better screen, and in some ways is more customizable (fuck that unmovable search bar).

      Like, really. Motorola is a sleeper brand. Not perfect, but damn good.

        • shaggyb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I had a model I can’t remember which was an emergency replacement from my OnePlus 3T years ago, then two G Powers of… Some years, then my Pixel 5a and then 8, and now a Razr 2024.

      • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        See? Pixel devices are nothing but a trip to the lemon grove, but people with debilitating chronic ass pain tearfully refuse to accept that they wasted their money on GETBRAND. I take those downvotes as an unofficial census confirming how many people don’t know ball.