AbuTahir@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-25日前Apple just proved AI "reasoning" models like Claude, DeepSeek-R1, and o3-mini don't actually reason at all. They just memorize patterns really well.archive.isexternal-linkmessage-square346fedilinkarrow-up1862arrow-down142file-textcross-posted to: apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world
arrow-up1820arrow-down1external-linkApple just proved AI "reasoning" models like Claude, DeepSeek-R1, and o3-mini don't actually reason at all. They just memorize patterns really well.archive.isAbuTahir@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-25日前message-square346fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world
minus-squarekadup@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·5日前 By that metric, you can argue Kasparov isn’t thinking during chess Kasparov’s thinking fits pretty much all biological definitions of thinking. Which is the entire point.
Kasparov’s thinking fits pretty much all biological definitions of thinking. Which is the entire point.
Is thinking necessarily biologic?