• Almacca@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The content’s theirs whether they win or not, isn’t it? It’s in the EULA when you sign up.

    Edit: Here’s the clause.

    You retain any ownership rights you have in Your Content, but you grant Reddit the following license to use that Content:

    When Your Content is created with or submitted to the Services, you grant us a worldwide, royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, transferable, and sublicensable license to use, copy, modify, adapt, prepare derivative works of, distribute, store, perform, and display Your Content and any name, username, voice, or likeness provided in connection with Your Content in all media formats and channels now known or later developed anywhere in the world. This license includes the right for us to make Your Content available for syndication, broadcast, distribution, or publication by other companies, organizations, or individuals who partner with Reddit. For example, this license includes the right to use Your Content to train AI and machine learning models, as further described in our Public Content Policy. You also agree that we may remove metadata associated with Your Content, and you irrevocably waive any claims and assertions of moral rights or attribution with respect to Your Content.

    • JonsJava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      non-exclusive

      That means we can license all our content to another company, and Reddit would be forced to allow them to fetch it, as we still own it, right?

      • Almacca@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It certainly reads that way. Gonna start a Reddit User Collective? Licence it to Anthropic at a discount to undercut Reddit? That could be pretty funny.

        • General_Effort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          That would be legally possible, though, obviously, you would have to pay for your own servers.

          In practice, it wouldn’t be worth anyone’s time.

          • Almacca@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I don’t see why. Users own the content wherever it’s located. Reddit, of course, would be free to remove that content, but that would be cutting off their own nose to spite their face and is also acceptable.

            • General_Effort@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              You don’t see why you would need your own servers? Do you see why unauthorized access to a computer system might be illegal?

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Non-exclusive just means you’re free to give a copy of your content to whoever you want. It doesn’t mean Reddit is obligated to distribute it for you.

      • General_Effort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        No. Just because you own a copyright, doesn’t mean that you are entitled to free network services. If you owned the copyright to a movie, would you expect free tickets for any cinema showing it?