• drislands@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    It is a bit baffling. I think it’s more ethical than the alternative though: pay gating useful functionality. Offering paid pallete swaps doesn’t make a lot of sense to me, someone who would never pay for that, but it does at least mean I can just ignore it. If they were to, say, restrict voice calls to a paid subscription, suddenly I’m in a position where either I’m paying for the service or ditching it entirely.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      They already do pay-gate useful functionality, this is just an alternative revenue stream