• db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s Apple, they’re clearly mimicking innovating it for the first time ever.

  • who@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The normalisation of constant surveillance makes me want to vomit.

  • vext01@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t need or want this, but I’m curious as to whether they will make prescription lenses for it.

    The shape of the lense is unconventional.

    • mbirth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, I can’t imagine they do this single piece of glass approach they came up with in those designs…

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The title is just a straight up lie:

    Gurman notes that true AR-integrated glasses may still be several years away.

    By year’s end, Apple aims to finalize prototypes sourced from international suppliers

  • mbirth@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The glasses will include cameras, microphones, and speakers for real-time interaction, allowing users to make calls, get directions, enjoy music, and benefit from live translations.

    I can do all that with my AirPods already. What would I need those glasses for?

    Despite “AR” features being absent, do they at least have a simple display in them - similar to the Even Realities G1?

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    No AR, just camera, mike and speakers?

    So this is only going to do one “app”, being Siri or whatever Apple calls their AI service now.

    Sounds like the Humane AI pin but wear it on your face.