has anyone noticed pages that are just ai slop popping up recently? they have low quality information and serve no purpose but to waste time.

if you haven’t experienced these, just search up a common tech problem and click on a generically named site. chances are, it will have a table of context and generally low quality writing. if you get lucky, there might also be some blatant lies in there(for example: this site claims garmin instinct watches have an sd card).

is there a ublock origin blocklist for these? thank you for suggestions.

  • MoonMelon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s not just tech. Gardening, DIY, cooking, and similar popular subjects have been completely destroyed by this crap. If I see an AI generated header image or thumbnail I immediately backpedal now because I assume that means the text is bullshit too.

    The example stuck in my memory now is when I was trying to read about watermelon growing times and the article said they flower a week after germination.There’s now frequently this, “oh GOD DAMN IT *close tab*” moment when you realize it’s actually total slop. Like, “oh so this article is BULLSHIT bullshit.”

    • HouseWolf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      If I’m looking for information that doesn’t need to be super recent/up to date, I just limit my search results to before November 2022 at least.

      It’s the “nuclear option” but it’s worked for me a handful of times.

      Now just wish DDG let me have that filter for the images tab to make finding new wallpapers easier for me…

    • Chip_Rat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I have been worried about this for months. The moment of clarity for me came when I was looking up how to tan a hide fur off. I have done fur on and seen a dozen videos on it so I knew what I was looking at. Found this great looking site. Step by step. As I’m reading, something seems off. Maybe translation issues? The order here seems… Repeatative?

      Then I look at the pictures.

      First picture showed a hide being made into a drum. Ok, not exactly what I’m doing but yeah maybe similar process… Next picture is of a dudes abs, with a tan line… (Tanning the hide)

      Next picture is a head table for a wedding… (Decorating)

      It was surreal. And it is surreal. We are now returning to a time when we can’t access information easily. Not because it isn’t there, but because it’s crowded by misinformation and half information.

  • zurohki@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    chances are, it will have a table of context and generally low quality writing

    Don’t forget repeating the question over and over again. If my question gets rephrased four times in the first four sentences, it’s a good sign that I’m reading AI slop and there’s no actual answer in the pages and pages of text.

  • besselj@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 day ago

    With how much SEO spam/slop that comes up in search engines, it would probably just be easier to whitelist trusted websites

  • Psythik@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Recently? It’s been happening for years.

    Every one of these websites looks the same too. Like a mix between a blog and a wiki, and always in FAQ form. You can tell that they’re AI-generated because the questions will seem related to each other but the answers often aren’t.

    • apis@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      And they often have the same question worded slightly differently three or four times in the first paragraph.

  • goldteeth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    I use uBlacklist with this filter and that generally keeps the repeat offenders at least out of image search, but clearing out every SEO-spam print-on-demand mimc-site was already a game of whack-a-mole before consumer LLMs became a thing; I imagine now it’d be like playing whack-a-mole with a hydra. Still, it does at least help.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Search engines need to start using AI detectors and drop the ranking way down when any significant portion of the page is AI generated.

      • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 day ago

        AI detectors are massively flawed. They have terrible accuracy and have high numbers of false positives. Especially over short bodies of text like parts of one page

  • Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Tried looking up how to bake wholemeal bread with just plain wholemeal flour and white bread flour (I can’t buy wholemeal bread flour at my supermarket). AI really is everywhere and it’s making the internet useless.

    Guess I could’ve done the before:202X trick.

    • MoonMelon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you can find it, I keep a small bag of straight-up wheat gluten and I add a spoonful or two when I want to make stronger flour. A small bag lasts forever and a little goes a long way.

    • apis@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Increasingly find that search engines ignore instructions to filter by date or site, which coupled with ignoring all operands will kill off their utility entirely.