gsa32@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoX sues Calif. to avoid revealing how it makes “controversial” content decisionsarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1553arrow-down117cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1536arrow-down1external-linkX sues Calif. to avoid revealing how it makes “controversial” content decisionsarstechnica.comgsa32@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square34fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squarescarabic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 years agoIs this the process? You don’t like a law so you sue the state? Is this how laws get challenged and kicked upward for constitutionality review?
minus-squarefluxion@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 years agoYes: as with most laws, you fling a bunch of money at it until you get your way.
minus-squareHackerman_uwu@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years agoAh yes. The true ’how a bill becomes a law’.
minus-squareRemmock@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 years agoIt’s been the process since the Corporatist push of the late 1970’s.
minus-squarenorbert@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoIt’s definitely part of a process. There’s a reason all the scumbags in congress are lawyers.
Is this the process? You don’t like a law so you sue the state? Is this how laws get challenged and kicked upward for constitutionality review?
Yes: as with most laws, you fling a bunch of money at it until you get your way.
Ah yes. The true ’how a bill becomes a law’.
It’s been the process since the Corporatist push of the late 1970’s.
It’s definitely part of a process. There’s a reason all the scumbags in congress are lawyers.