RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agoX fails to avoid Australia child safety fine by arguing Twitter doesn’t existarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up1542arrow-down114
arrow-up1528arrow-down1external-linkX fails to avoid Australia child safety fine by arguing Twitter doesn’t existarstechnica.comRmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square50fedilink
minus-squareFireWire400@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up42·edit-27 months agoAs long as twitter.com redirects to X, it’s officially still called Twitter, I don’t care what Elmo says
minus-squareProx@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-27 months agoWouldn’t the business license say still be for Twitter, with a DBA “X”?
minus-squareMisterFrog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-27 months agoI’ve had a dig (I have no idea what I’m doing) but in this ASIC registry, seems to show they filed to try and wind up the company, and that was rejected? Again, not a lawyer. (See the “Documents” section) https://connectonline.asic.gov.au/RegistrySearch/faces/landing/panelSearch.jspx?searchText=647102672&searchType=OrgAndBusNm Edit to add: And they still have their trademark registered, so it clearly still exists haha how bizarre.
As long as twitter.com redirects to X, it’s officially still called Twitter, I don’t care what Elmo says
Wouldn’t the business license say still be for Twitter, with a DBA “X”?
I’ve had a dig (I have no idea what I’m doing) but in this ASIC registry, seems to show they filed to try and wind up the company, and that was rejected? Again, not a lawyer. (See the “Documents” section)
https://connectonline.asic.gov.au/RegistrySearch/faces/landing/panelSearch.jspx?searchText=647102672&searchType=OrgAndBusNm
Edit to add: And they still have their trademark registered, so it clearly still exists haha how bizarre.