return2ozma@lemmy.world to United States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml · 11 months agoWill the Debate This Week Be ‘Rah-Rah’ or ‘Ruh-Roh?’www.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up127arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up126arrow-down1external-linkWill the Debate This Week Be ‘Rah-Rah’ or ‘Ruh-Roh?’www.nytimes.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to United States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml · 11 months agomessage-square12fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-211 months agoOr “ho hum.” Who doesn’t know the candidates yet and thinks they’ll learn anything about them?
minus-squareFlaminGoku@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months agoIf it even happens. Trump is looking for every reason to not attend.
minus-squaredelirious_owl@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·11 months agoI, for one, haven’t seen a few of the US candidates at a debate.
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·11 months agoThere are two candidates. No, the others are not viable. Yes I know that’s unfair. Yes voting for them is basically not voting and potentially helps another candidate you “hate more” to win instead.
minus-squaredelirious_owl@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·11 months agoThere are more than 2 candidates.
Or “ho hum.”
Who doesn’t know the candidates yet and thinks they’ll learn anything about them?
If it even happens. Trump is looking for every reason to not attend.
I, for one, haven’t seen a few of the US candidates at a debate.
There are two candidates. No, the others are not viable. Yes I know that’s unfair. Yes voting for them is basically not voting and potentially helps another candidate you “hate more” to win instead.
There are more than 2 candidates.
Good luck with that.