gioia://news
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
silence7@slrpnk.net to United States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml · 2 years ago

Climate Is Now a US Culture War Issue

www.nytimes.com

external-link
message-square
53
fedilink
177
external-link

Climate Is Now a US Culture War Issue

www.nytimes.com

silence7@slrpnk.net to United States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml · 2 years ago
message-square
53
fedilink
Opinion | Climate Is Now a Culture War Issue
www.nytimes.com
external-link
And it couldn’t have happened at a worse time.
  • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Basically, China had a bunch of industrial policy around capturing the solar manufacturing, and a willingness to use slave labor to undercut prices in the rest of the world.

    It’s worth nothing that trade doesn’t make a huge difference to emissions.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s a really dishonest framing of China’s policies given that it’s the one place in the world where wages are actually going up and poverty is being eliminated:

      If we take just one country, China, out of the global poverty equation, then even under the $1.90 poverty standard we find that the extreme poverty headcount is the exact same as it was in 1981.

      The $1.90/day (2011 PPP) line is not an adequate or in any way satisfactory level of consumption; it is explicitly an extreme measure. Some analysts suggest that around $7.40/day is the minimum necessary to achieve good nutrition and normal life expectancy, while others propose we use the US poverty line, which is $15.

      Labor in China is far from being cheapest in the world today, so your whole narrative here is based on a false premise.

      What China had the willingness to do was to create a concrete plan to move off fossil fuels and then commit to implementing it long term.

      Meanwhile, the relative difference is pretty significant:

      For example, the USA has a value of 7.7% meaning its net import of CO2 is equivalent to 7.7% of its domestic emissions. This means emissions calculated on the basis of ‘consumption’ are 7.7% higher than their emissions based on production.

      For example, China’s value of -14% means its net export of CO2 is equivalent to 14% of its domestic emissions. The consumption-based emissions of China are 14% lower than their production-based emissions.

      And then we have to look at this in the context of per capita emissions which is even worse https://ourworldindata.org/co2/country/united-states?country=USA~CHN

      The key part in all this is that China is transitioning off fossil fuels while US keeps talking about it, while having done little tangible work in this regard.

      • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        They’re specifically using forced labor from Uyghurs for solar manufacturing. It’s a problem, and one that’s complicating the ability of China to export solar panels.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          There’s no actual evidence for this claim. If you want to see actual forced labour then look at US prison system. US has the highest incarceration rate in the world and prisoners are used as literal slave labour. Meanwhile, the smear by US regime is also having very little actual impact on China’s ability to export solar panels.

          • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            If it’s not real, China can open up the region to outsiders, and let workers communicate freely without monitors present or spyware on their phones.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              2 years ago

              China has opened up the region to outsiders plenty of people have visited it including western news agencies. Here’s one example. You’re just regurgitating propaganda your regime is feeding you, there is no evidence for it. Meanwhile, we have lots of concrete evidence for precisely the sorts of atrocities US accuses China of happening in US. Maybe focus on what’s happening in your own country.

              • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                Lol.

                And it’s seen in the fear that was ever-present, just below the surface, on two rare trips to Xinjiang I made for The Associated Press, one on a state-guided tour for the foreign press.

                A bike seller’s eyes widened in alarm when he learned I was a foreigner. He picked up his phone and began dialing the police.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  That’s a great example of the language western propagandists like to use that resonates with people like you. However, once you read past the spin it’s pretty clear that they’re not able to find any tangible evidence of repression they’re claiming. Of course, this kind of narrative works because Americans are primed to believe it without question. I guess thinking that China uses slave labour in Xinjiang is what helps you somehow rationalize why US isn’t doing anything to transition off fossils.

                  • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 years ago

                    Official policy of the United States is to actually get off fossil fuels

                    And legislation to get the country a chunk of the way there passed last year

                    So no, not nothing.

United States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml

usa@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !usa@lemmy.ml
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 45 users / day
  • 741 users / week
  • 2.25K users / month
  • 9.83K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 8K subscribers
  • 6.97K Posts
  • 41.2K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • pangyuehung@lemmy.ml
  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org