mFat@lemdro.id to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 年前GitHub - SerenityOS/serenity: The Serenity Operating System 🐞github.comexternal-linkmessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1248arrow-down15
arrow-up1243arrow-down1external-linkGitHub - SerenityOS/serenity: The Serenity Operating System 🐞github.commFat@lemdro.id to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 年前message-square45fedilink
minus-squarelily33@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-22 年前Reading this text, it looks kinda like the difference between red (#FF0000) apples, red (#FF0001) apples, and red (#FF0100) apples…
minus-squareJustEnoughDucks@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 年前After reading your link, they can absolutely be used interchangably in a comparison with copyleft licenses. Your own link says that they are very similar. https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/217/what-are-the-essential-differences-between-the-bsd-and-mit-licences#582
minus-squareduncesplayed@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 年前For anyone not wanting to read through that article, here’s the tl;dr: Apache requires you to note what changes (if they’re “substantial”) you made to the code. Otherwise it’s identical to MIT. BSD is effectively identical to MIT.
deleted by creator
Reading this text, it looks kinda like the difference between red (#FF0000) apples, red (#FF0001) apples, and red (#FF0100) apples…
After reading your link, they can absolutely be used interchangably in a comparison with copyleft licenses. Your own link says that they are very similar.
https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/217/what-are-the-essential-differences-between-the-bsd-and-mit-licences#582
For anyone not wanting to read through that article, here’s the tl;dr:
Apache requires you to note what changes (if they’re “substantial”) you made to the code. Otherwise it’s identical to MIT.
BSD is effectively identical to MIT.