i_have_no_enemies@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoScientific progress is declining due to bureaucratization of research. Scientific innovations should make ‘zero to one’ breakthroughs, instead making ‘one to many’ improvements to existing innovationswww.livemint.comexternal-linkmessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1231arrow-down133
arrow-up1198arrow-down1external-linkScientific progress is declining due to bureaucratization of research. Scientific innovations should make ‘zero to one’ breakthroughs, instead making ‘one to many’ improvements to existing innovationswww.livemint.comi_have_no_enemies@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squareTheHolyChecksum@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down4·2 years agoOf course not. Capitalism is only good for a very tiny subset of the population’s bank accounts.
minus-squarei_have_no_enemies@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down8·2 years agowhat about creativity? does it promote creativity?
minus-squareDenvil@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 years agoIt promotes money. If creativity happens to align with that, then yes.
minus-squareRichCaffeineFlavor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·2 years agoRemoved by mod
Of course not. Capitalism is only good for a very tiny subset of the population’s bank accounts.
what about creativity? does it promote creativity?
It promotes money. If creativity happens to align with that, then yes.
deleted by creator
Removed by mod