L4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoTech bros' attitude to female colleagues stuck in dark ageswww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1211arrow-down142file-text
arrow-up1169arrow-down1external-linkTech bros' attitude to female colleagues stuck in dark ageswww.theregister.comL4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square52fedilinkfile-text
Tech bros’ attitude to female colleagues stuck in dark ages::Research sheds light on attitudes holding industry back
minus-squareTattorack@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23arrow-down2·2 years agoWhen someone says “fact” I expect to see a fact. As in, evidence that makes something stated as a fact an actual fact. Otherwise it’s just an anecdote, and no better than the anecdotes in the article linked above.
minus-square0x0@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down8·edit-22 years agoAn anecdote it is, then. I wonder if all the downvoters read past the first sentence.
minus-squareBlack616Angel@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 years agoDid you read past the first two words of the headline? It says “attitude towards female colleagues” not “pay for female employees”. And the article reflects that, your comment not that much…
When someone says “fact” I expect to see a fact. As in, evidence that makes something stated as a fact an actual fact. Otherwise it’s just an anecdote, and no better than the anecdotes in the article linked above.
An anecdote it is, then. I wonder if all the downvoters read past the first sentence.
Did you read past the first two words of the headline?
It says “attitude towards female colleagues” not “pay for female employees”. And the article reflects that, your comment not that much…