RobotToaster@mander.xyz to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 4 天前UK cinemas look at banning Meta smart glasses over piracy fearswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square29linkfedilinkarrow-up1175arrow-down12cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1173arrow-down1external-linkUK cinemas look at banning Meta smart glasses over piracy fearswww.theguardian.comRobotToaster@mander.xyz to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 4 天前message-square29linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squarejumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·4 天前the display is much more expensive than the camera so if there is any utility in there being a camer there is no reason to not have it
minus-squareWhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·3 天前oh lol. there’s a lot of reason. It’s called privacy. we shouldn’t stop there though, we need to get “laws” on that list too.
the display is much more expensive than the camera so if there is any utility in there being a camer there is no reason to not have it
oh lol. there’s a lot of reason. It’s called privacy. we shouldn’t stop there though, we need to get “laws” on that list too.