simple@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoQualcomm will try to have its Apple Silicon moment in PCs with “Snapdragon X”arstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1175arrow-down14
arrow-up1171arrow-down1external-linkQualcomm will try to have its Apple Silicon moment in PCs with “Snapdragon X”arstechnica.comsimple@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square49fedilink
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoWhere’s the installation iso?
minus-squarehackitfast@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years agoHere’s an archive of all Windows updates and builds. This query is for arm64. https://www.uup.ee/known.php?q=arm64
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·2 years agoThat’s not a safe place to get isos
minus-squarehackitfast@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoFrom a security perspective, as long as you check the hash against Microsoft’s website then it should be okay. Otherwise I’m not sure where to get Windows on ARM ISO’s from.
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 years agoThat’s my point. Microsoft doesn’t seem to want you to outside of the surface
minus-squarehackitfast@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoI mean yeah you’re not wrong. If only the Surface wasn’t so absurdly overpriced for what you get.
Where’s the installation iso?
Here’s an archive of all Windows updates and builds. This query is for arm64.
https://www.uup.ee/known.php?q=arm64
That’s not a safe place to get isos
From a security perspective, as long as you check the hash against Microsoft’s website then it should be okay. Otherwise I’m not sure where to get Windows on ARM ISO’s from.
That’s my point. Microsoft doesn’t seem to want you to outside of the surface
I mean yeah you’re not wrong. If only the Surface wasn’t so absurdly overpriced for what you get.