Only because the older folks keep pushing for apps and such by setting the example. If an analog option isn’t even discussed, the younger generation definitely won’t know how much simpler certain processes can be.

Instructions: paper

Feedback: green light, yellow light, red light.

Could be done with a button

Not if you speak Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, French, or Romanian.

Which combined is more people than just English speakers.

You can with cartridges. That’s why me and my friends get them. We swap.

What people are complaining about are apparently a feature digital games had, which I never knew about since I use physical media. I get why they’re salty about it, but it does sound like a weird loophole they never fixed and apparently even mentioned it in some web page of theirs it was possible, so like an officially sanctioned loophole?

I think this maybe deserves more attention.

Anyhow, I found the video for people curious: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBDNbpWSUx8

This one I’ve never heard

Don’t think that undo this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQJL3htsDyQ

Better name too

Voyager. I’ve had the issue since always

They still come back

Yeah, you’re right, people are too soft.

They should do that was done to Nazis during the war instead. Let me know if you volunteer walking into a BAR.

It’s people like you why I have to keep this damn gif around:

It’s not an association fallacy or poisoning the well if those things are actually being done, which has already been covered in the previous comments. Goggles is another current example of that.

You can go on and have your last word now, I’m done with your bad faith argument. I think there’s enough evidence in this comment thread by now for others to see you’re being disingenuous.

If you’re happy with tracking and spying at the browser level, then fine, but I’m interested in how we can put an end to that.

And brave has shown it’s not a solution to that at all, so there’s literally no reason to defend them, or use them.

Goggles is the first part, the owner is the second part

In short, I support these probably for the same reason you oppose Eich: I believe in freedom. I guess I define that a bit more liberally than you do.

I know you fake mofos are the type to always need to get the last word because it makes it seem to other dumdums that getting the last say is somehow “winning”, but I’m leaving this link here for anyone who remotely might believe your take is a good one:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

It’s not a strawman, it’s the problem.

It’s a strawman you’re still trying to prop up because the issue is not only the Brave browser itself, but the owners of it.

Even if we took your argument in good faith, it would still be flawed since Brave is based on Chromium, of which Google essentially controls at this point, so you’d still be supporting Google hegemony. In other words, even from that stance you’ve brought up, it would be a bad idea to use Brave vs Firefox, Librewolf, Konqueror, etc.

After a significant amount of time. Longer than Brave’s blunders. And rehabilitation is not erasure. Likewise, murder enough and society will consider to instead remove the person from society as well instead of rewarding them.

Murderer is a noun. Once you’ve murdered that’s what you are, regardless of past or present or future. People can change, but that doesn’t change what you’ve done in the past and have become, because you can’t undo what you did.

6 months to 5 years isn’t “A long time ago” btw. I think it takes at least a decade to start considering something a long time ago.